结核病健康教育文本材料的可读性评估

Readability evaluation on text materials for tuberculosis health education

目的 评估结核病健康教育文本材料的可读性,为相关机构的材料内容制作、材料传播方向等方面提供改进依据。方法 于2021年1—3月,采用分层抽样方法,选取我国部分省/市的疾病预防控制中心、结核病防治所/中心以及高校、中小学等机构使用的结核病健康教育文本材料作为评估对象。采用SAM量表评估其可读性。结果 共收集38份结核病健康教育文本材料,SAM量表适用及适用很好的材料数量为31份(81.57%)。其中,折页、小册子形式在读写能力需求、布局和排版维度上的得分率均高于其他形式,分别为[87.50(75.00,100.00)]%、[100.00(100.00,100.00)]%(P<0.05);疾病预防控制中心、结核病防治所/中心的材料在材料内容、读写能力需求维度上的得分率均高于高校、中小学的材料,分别为[82.41(75.00,100.00)]%、[60.52(50.00,87.50)]%(P<0.05)。结论 结核病健康教育文本材料整体可读性较好,但在材料内容、与读者的互动性、图文搭配、字体字号等方面仍存在短板,亟须改进。

Objective To evaluate the readability of text materials for tuberculosis health education,and to provide basis for the improvement of material content production and dissemination.Methods From January to March 2021,a stratified sampling method was adopted to select TB health education text materials used by the centers for Disease Control and Prevention,tuberculosis prevention and control institutes/centers,universities,primary and secondary schools and other institutions in some provinces/cities in China as the assessment object.The readability was evaluated by SAM scale.Results A total of 38 kinds of TB health education texts were collected,and 31(81.57%)were suitable for SAM scale.Among them,the score rates of folding pages and pamphlets in the dimensions of literacy demand[87.50(75.00,100.00)]%,layout and layout[100.00(100.00,100.00)]%were higher than other forms(P<0.05),respectively.The score rates of the materials from CDC and TB/center in the dimensions of material content[82.41(75.00,100.00)]%and literacy demand[60.52(50.00,87.50)]%were higher than those from universities and primary and secondary schools(P<0.05),respectively.Conclusion The text materials of tuberculosis health education have good readability,but there still have improvement space in material content,interaction with readers,graphic collocation,font size and so on.