期刊文献+

FOLFOX6化疗方案联合补气益肾方对结直肠癌患者免疫功能及肿瘤标志物的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨FOLFOX6化疗方案联合补气益肾方对结直肠癌(CRC)患者免疫功能及肿瘤标志物的影响。方法:选取我院2021年6月—2022年7月收治的83例CRC患者,按患者入院单尾号进行分组,单号纳入对照组(42例)、双号纳入研究组(41例);对照组予FOLFOX6化疗方案治疗,研究组予FOLFOX6化疗方案联合补气益肾方治疗;对比两组疗效、免疫功能指标、肿瘤标志物水平及毒副反应。结果:研究组总有效率(ORR)较对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,研究组CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)水平较对照组高,CEA、CA125、CA199水平较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组毒副反应总发生率较对照组低,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CRC患者采用FOLFOX6化疗方案联合补气益肾方治疗效果较好,可改善免疫功能,降低肿瘤标志物水平,且可在一定程度上减少毒副反应发生。
出处 《医学理论与实践》 2024年第8期1336-1338,共3页 The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献91

  • 1李文波,许明智,贾福军,高亚丽.汉密顿抑郁量表6项版本的临床应用[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2007,33(2):119-120. 被引量:81
  • 2Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000,92 (3) :205-216.
  • 3McHugh K, Kao S. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST): problems and need for modifications in paediatric oncology? Br J Radiol,2003,76(907): 433-436.
  • 4James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al.Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J NatlCancerInst,1999,91(6): 523-528.
  • 5Cortes J, Rodriguez J, Diaz-Gonzalez JA, et al. Comparison of unidimensional and bidimensional measurements in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer,2002,87(2): 158-160.
  • 6Trillet-Lenoir V, Freyer G, Kaemmerlen P,et al. Assessment of tumour response to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: accuracy of the RECIST criteria. Br J Radiol,2002,75(899): 903-908.
  • 7World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects[J].{H}JAMA:the Journal of the American Medical Association,2013,(20):2191-2194.
  • 8WMA Declaration of Helsinki Working Group. Draft revised text for public consultation,15 April-15 June 2013 Annotated version[EB/OL].http://www.wma.net/en/20activities/10ethics/10helsinki/15publicconsult/DoH-draft-for-public-consultation_annotated.pdf,2013.
  • 9University of Michigan. Guidelines for using magnitude of harm in categorizing risk level[EB/OL].http://medicine.umich.edu/medschool/sites/medicine.umich.edu.medschool/files/res_irbmed_Risk-guide.pdf,2013.
  • 10FDA. Human Subject Protection; Foreign Clinical Studies Not Conducted Under an Investigational New Drug Application[EB/OL].http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2008-04-28/pdf/E8-9200.pdf#page=1,2013.

共引文献624

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部