期刊文献+

综合素质评价区域推进的诉求与路径——基于三个典型案例的实践分析

The Internal Demand and Path Choice of Regional Promotion of Compre⁃hensive Quality Evaluation—A Practical Analysis Based on Three Typical Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 综合素质评价区域推进是撬动教育评价改革的重要抓手,已成为推动新时代基础教育改革的关键。通过对综合素质评价区域推进典型案例的剖析,旨在从评价理念、评价目标、评价方法、评价文化四方面明晰其内在诉求,进而在综合素质评价的开展中充分发挥区域推进优势,具体而言,应当从以下方面着力:一是将“立德树人”作为制度设计的根本要求;二是区域内各学段明确职责、合理分工;三是评价方式要凸显不同学段的育人目标;四是宣传新型评价文化,营造优良的评价生态,助力综合素质评价区域推进有效实施。 The regional promotion of comprehensive quality evaluation is an important lever for leveraging educational evalu-ation reform,and has become the key to promoting basic education reform in the new era.Through the analysis of typical cases of regional promotion of comprehensive quality evaluation,this study aims to clarify its inherent demands from four aspects of evalua-tion philosophy,evaluation objectives,evaluation methods,and evaluation culture,and to fully leverage the advantages of regional promotion when comprehensive quality evaluation is practiced.Specifically,efforts should be made from the following aspects:firstly,moral education should be treated as the fundamental requirement of institutional design;secondly,the responsibilities should be clarified in different educational stages within the region and reasonable division of work should be arranged;thirdly,the evaluation methods should highlight the educational goals of different educational stages;fourthly the new evaluation culture should be promoted and a good evaluation ecosystem should be created,which can help encourage the effective implementation of comprehensive quality evaluation in the region.
作者 宋丽芹 姬国君 SONG Liqin;JI Guojun(Faculty of Education,Henan University,Kaifeng Henan,475004)
出处 《现代基础教育研究》 2024年第1期120-125,共6页 Research on Modern Basic Education
基金 2024年度河南省高校人文社会科学一般项目“以班级保教质量评价促进幼儿教师专业能力发展的支持路径研究”(项目号:2024-ZZJH-060)的研究成果。
关键词 综合素质评价 区域推进 内在诉求 路径选择 comprehensive quality evaluation regional promotion internal demands choice of path
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献38

  • 1李成彦.组织文化研究综述[J].学术交流,2006(6):183-185. 被引量:42
  • 2Pinar, W. F. & Irwin, R. L. Curriculum in a New Key: The Collected Works of Ted T. Aoki [M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ- ates, Inc. 2005. 144-150.
  • 3[美]比尔·约翰逊.学生表现评定手册[M].李雁冰译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.
  • 4[美]埃利奥特·w.艾斯纳.教育想象——学校课程设计与评价[M].李雁冰译.北京:教育科学出版社,2008,(216).
  • 5See Wiggins, G. Educative Assessment. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass; Eisner, E. W. Reshaping Assessment in Education: Some Criteria in Search of Practice[J]. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1998. 25, (3).
  • 6[澳]科林·马什.理解课程的关键概念[M].徐佳,吴刚平译.北京:教育科学出版社,2009.65.
  • 7Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. W. Fourth Generation Evaluation[M]. Newbury Park, CA, Sage, 1989.
  • 8Pinar, W. F. & Irwin, R. L. Curriculum in a New Key: The Collected Works of Ted T. Aoki[M]. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 2005. 143.
  • 9[美]约翰·杜威著 王承绪译.民主主义与教育[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001..
  • 10D. Royce Sadler.Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems[J].Instructional Science.1989(2)

共引文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部