期刊文献+

高校资助育人关键风险分析的模型改进

Model Improvement on Key Risk Analysis of College Funded Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以高校资助的“育人”环节为研究对象,对传统失效模式与后果分析(FMEA)模型加以改进,通过结合三角模糊数、风险指标赋权、专家客观赋权、德尔菲法和调研访谈等方式,提出模糊FMEA模型用以分析“育人”环节的失效模式和关键风险。研究发现,改进模型能够更客观反映风险指标重要性和专家话语权的差异,具有较高的精确性和可靠性,同时针对高风险失效模式提出了相应建议。 Taking the“education”process funded by college as the research object,this paper tries to improve the traditional failure mode and effects analysis(FMEA).It proposes a fuzzy FMEA model to analyze the failure modes and key risks of the“education”process by combining triangular fuzzy numbers,weights of risk indices,object weights of experts,the Delphi method,and interviews.It is found that the model proposed objectively reflects the importance of risk indices and difference among experts’discourse power,which means that the model proposed has a higher accuracy and reliability.Suggestions for high-risk failure modes are proposed.
作者 尤筱玥 陈慧怡 YOU Xiaoyue;CHEN Huiyi(Sino-German College of Applied Sciences,Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China;State Grid Shanghai Municipal Electric Power Company,Shanghai 200122,China)
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期647-654,共8页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 上海市青年科技英才扬帆计划(21YF1449500) “科技创新行动计划”软科学项目(22692198500)。
关键词 失效模式与后果分析 模糊集 高校资助育人 高等教育 failure mode and effects analysis fuzzy set college funded education higher education
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1杨爱民.“资助”与“育人”结合 构建新型助学体系[J].中国高等教育,2005(17):39-40. 被引量:51
  • 2Sun, Liu, Qiu, Wang. Hybrid multiple attribute group decision-making for power system restoration[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015.
  • 3Vahdani, Mousavi, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam. Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS meth- od[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35 ( 9 ): 4257-4269.
  • 4Beliakov, Pagola, Wilkin. Vector valued similarity measures for Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 280: 352-367.
  • 5De Miguel, Bustince, Fernandez, Indur~iin, Koles~ov~i, Mesiar. Construction of admissible linear orders for in- terval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets with an application to decision making[J]. Information Fusion, 2015.
  • 6Chen. A prioritized aggregation operator-based approach to multiple criteria decision making using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets : A comparative perspec- tive[J]. Information Sciences, 2014, 281: 97-112.
  • 7Farhadinia. A theoretical development on the entropy of interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the intuitionistic dis- tance and its relationship with similarity meas- ure[J]. Knowledge-BasedSystems, 2013, 39: 79-84.
  • 8Du, Hu. Aggregation distance measure and its induced similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2015.
  • 9Liu, Shen, Zhang, Chen, Wang. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis mod- el-based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 245 (1): 209-225.
  • 10Li, He. Intuitionistic fuzzy PRI-AND and PRI-OR ag- gregation operators[J]. Information Fusion, 2013, 14( 4 ): 450-459.

共引文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部