民族地区县级政府社会治理能力绩效评估——以桂黔7县为例

Performance Evaluation of Social Governance Capability of County-level Governments in Ethnic Regions:A Study of 7 Counties in Guangxi and Guizhou

民族地区县级政府社会治理能力是我国社会治理能力的重要组成部分。在社会治理体系五大构成要素的基础上,通过“修正型德尔菲法”、AHP法以及专家赋权法,最终确定了包括56项指标的民族地区县级政府社会治理能力绩效评估指标体系。利用2022年桂黔7个县的数据,对民族地区县级政府社会治理能力绩效进行了实证分析。研究发现:社会治理能力呈现XA县>CX市>LZ县>NM县>LP县>TZ县>HJ县,从障碍度看,社会治理方式要素和社会治理内容要素是2个最主要的障碍因素,障碍度平均值分别为22.59%、22.2%,社会治理资源要素障碍度较高,均值达到20.34%,社会治理主体要素和社会治理价值要素障碍度则较低,影响较小。建议民族地区县级政府必须坚持以人民为中心的发展理念;建立上下有效互动的社会治理体系;完善党建引领县域社会治理体系;优化内部治理能力,拓展社会组织的基层服务能力。

The social governance capability of county-level governments in ethnic regions is an important component of China's social governance capability.On the basis of the five components of the social governance system,this paper uses the Modified Delphi Method,AHP Method,and Experts'Weight to finally determine the performance evaluation indicator system of county-level governments'social governance capability in ethnic areas,including 56 indicators and their weights.Using data from 7 counties in Guangxi and Guizhou in 2022,the paper conducted an empirical analysis on the performance of county-level governments'social governance capability.It found that the social governance capability presents as XA County>CX City>LZ County>NM County>LP County>TZ County>HJ County.From the perspective of obstacle degree,the ways and contents of social governance are two most important obstacle factors,with an average obstacle degree of 22.59% and 22.2%.The obstacle degree of social governance resource is also high,with an average of 20.34%,while the obstacle degree of social governance subject and social governance value is relatively low,and their impacts are relatively small.Next,county-level governments in ethnic areas must adhere to the development philosophy of putting the people at the center;they should establish an effective social governance system of effective interactions from top to bottom and guide the county-level social governance system through Party building;and they should optimize internal governance capabilities and expand the grassroots service capabilities of non-governmental organizations.