期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT与超声诊断急性阑尾炎的效能对比

Comparison on the Efficiencies of Multi-Slice Spiral CT and Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较多层螺旋CT(MSCT)与超声诊断急性阑尾炎的效能。方法选取2020年5月至2023年1月我院收治的疑似急性阑尾炎患者125例,均行MSCT与超声检查,分析急性阑尾炎的MSCT、超声影像学表现。以手术病理结果为标准,比较MSCT、超声诊断急性阑尾炎的效能。结果MSCT与手术病理诊断结果的一致性较好(Kappa=0.914,P<0.001),超声与手术病理诊断结果的一致性一般(Kappa=0.731,P<0.001)。MSCT诊断急性阑尾炎的灵敏度、特异度、准确率均显著高于超声(P<0.05)。结论MSCT及超声诊断急性阑尾炎均有一定的价值,但MSCT较超声具有更高的诊断效能,可降低漏诊、误诊风险。 Objective To compare the efficiencies of multi-slice spiral CT(MSCT)and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Methods A total of 125 patients with suspected acute appendicitis admitted to our hospital from May 2020 to January 2023 were selected.All patients were examined by MSCT and ultrasound,and the MSCT and ultrasound imaging manifestations of acute appendicitis were analyzed.Based on the results of surgical pathology,the efficiencies of MSCT and ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were compared.Results The consistency between MSCT and surgical pathological diagnosis results was good(Kappa=0.914,P<0.001),and the consistency between ultrasound and surgical pathological diagnosis results was general(Kappa=0.731,P<0.001).The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy of MSCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were significantly higher than those of ultrasound(P<0.05).Conclusions Both MSCT and ultrasound have certain value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis,but MSCT has higher diagnostic efficiency than ultrasound,which can reduce the risk of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis.
作者 郭玉廷 张波 常莎 GUO Yuting;ZHANG Bo;CHANG Sha(Department of Radiology,Zhongzhan District People's Hospital,Jiaozuo 454150,China)
出处 《临床医学工程》 2024年第4期403-404,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 急性阑尾炎 多层螺旋CT 超声 Acuteappendicitis Multi-slice spiral CT Ultrasound
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献83

  • 1张天富,吴海璐,夏标,苏伟,何茜.老年急性阑尾炎CT影像学特征与临床评估[J].中国临床实用医学,2019,10(4):41-45. 被引量:7
  • 2王康,赵泽华,王之,张国桢,王伟忠,徐嵩森,张淼,刘文瑾,奉典旭.应用多层螺旋CT多方位重建技术诊断急性阑尾炎的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(2):177-180. 被引量:127
  • 3Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA. CT ofappendicitis in children [J]. Radiology, 2002,224 (2) -.325-332.
  • 4Bendeck SE,Nino-Murcia M,Berry GJ,et al. Imaging forsuspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy andperforation rates [J]. Radiology,2002,225 ( 1 ): 131 136.
  • 5Applegate KE’Sivit CJ,Salvator AE,etal. Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy andperforation rates in children [J], Radiology . 2001 . 220(1):103 - 107.
  • 6Horrow MM, White DS,Horrow JC. Differentiation ofperforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT [J].Radiology,221W :46 _ 51.
  • 7Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I,et al. Perforated andnonperforated appendicitis : defect in enhancing appendicealwall-depiction with multi-detector row CT [ J ].2008,246(1) : 142 — 147.
  • 8Lin CJ,Chen JD,Tiu CM,ei al. Can ruptured appendicitisbe detected preoperatively in the ED? [J]. Am J EmergM^,2005,23(1):60- 66.
  • 9Bixby SD,Lucey BC? Soto JA, et al. Perforated versusnonperforated acute appendicitis : accuracy of multidetectorCT detection [J]. Radiology,2006,241 (3) :780 _ 786.
  • 10Suh SW, Choi YS,Park JM, et al. Clinical factors fordistinguishing perforated from nonperforated appendicitis :a comparison using multidetector computed tomography in528 laparoscopic appendectomies [ J ]. Surg LaparoscEndosc Percutan Tech ,2011 ?21 (2) :72 - 75.

共引文献122

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部