期刊文献+

碳信息披露、企业收益与债务融资成本

Carbon Information Disclosure,Enterprise Income and Debt Financing Cost
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国“双碳”目标的实施,包括银行机构和债权人在内的利益相关者对企业低碳社会责任履行情况愈发关注。碳信息披露是否影响债务融资成本是一个值得研究的课题。本文通过分析碳信息披露、企业收益与债务融资成本之间的关系作用机理,提出碳信息披露与债务融资成本呈负相关关系,且企业收益在其中起中介作用的研究假设,并使用逐步回归法对研究假设进行验证。基于研究结论,文章提出企业为了更好发展应积极提高碳信息披露的主动性以及保护环境的社会责任感;同时政府需持续加强对碳信息披露的监督管理,以保障银行机构及债权人利益。 As China implements its"dual-carbon"goals,stakeholders,including banking institutions and creditors,are increasingly concerned about corporate performance in fulfi lling low-carbon social responsibilities.Whether carbon disclosure affects the cost of debt financing is a topic worthy of study.This paper analyzes the mechanism of the relationship between carbon disclosure,corporate earnings,and the cost of debt fi nancing.It proposes a hypothesis that carbon disclosure is negatively correlated with the cost of debt fi nancing,with corporate earnings playing an intermediary role,and validates this hypothesis using stepwise regression analysis.Based on the research fi ndings,the paper suggests that companies should actively enhance the proactiveness of carbon disclosure and their sense of social responsibility for environmental protection to better their development.Meanwhile,the government should continuously strengthen supervision and management of carbon disclosure to safeguard the interests of banking institutions and creditors.
作者 吴泽坤 吕震宇 Wu Zekun;Lyu Zhenyu(North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063200,Hebei)
机构地区 华北理工大学
出处 《中国商论》 2024年第8期111-114,共4页 China Journal of Commerce
关键词 碳信息披露 企业收益 债务融资成本 中介效应 双碳目标 carbon information disclosure enterprise income debt fi nancing cost mediating eff ect “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”goals
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1张巧良,宋文博,谭婧.碳排放量、碳信息披露质量与企业价值[J].南京审计学院学报,2013,10(2):56-63. 被引量:53
  • 2沈洪涛,金婷婷.我国上市公司社会责任信息披露的现状分析[J].审计与经济研究,2006,21(3):84-87. 被引量:145
  • 3温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷, 刘红云..中介效应的检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.
  • 4Deegan C. ,Gordon B. A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations[J]. Accounting & Busi- ness Research, 1996,26, (3) : 187 - 199.
  • 5Deng X. , Kang J. K. , Low B S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Value Maximization:Evidence from Mergers [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013,110, ( 1 ) : 87 - 109.
  • 6Dhaliwal D. , Radhakrishnan S. ,Tsang A. , Yong George Y. Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Fore-cast Accuracy:Interna- tional Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure[J]. The Accounting Review,2012,87, (3) :723 -759.
  • 7Finster M. P. , Hernke M. T. Benefits Organizations Pursue when Seeking Competitive Advantage by Improving Environmental Performance [J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2014,18, (5) :652 - 662.
  • 8Freedman M. , Stagliano A. J. European Unification, Accounting Harmonization, and Social Disclosures [J]. The International Journal of Accounting. 1992, (27) : 112 - 122.
  • 9Freeman R. E., Reed D L Stockholders and Stakeholders:A New Perspective on Corporate Governance [J]. California Man- agement Review, 1983,25, (3) :88 - 106.
  • 10Gray R. , Owen D. , Maunders K. Corporate Social Reporting:Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract[J]. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1988,1, (1) :6 -20.

共引文献127

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部