期刊文献+

岗位能力本位视角下的高校课程教学评价改革路径

Reform path of course teaching evaluation of higher education curriculum from the perspective of job competency
下载PDF
导出
摘要 课程教学评价是检验教师的教学效果和学生学习情况的重要手段之一。针对部分高校课程教学评价在评价主体、评价标准、评价形式等方面存在的问题,采用文献分析法、案例分析法,以阳光学院人工智能学院计算机类实训课程为例,借鉴岗位能力本位评价模式,引入多元评价主体,以岗位核心能力培养为目标,采用过程性评价模式,考查课程教学目标的达成情况。研究结论为进一步提升高校课程教学评价效果提供参考。 The evaluation of course teaching is one of the important means to test the teaching effectiveness of teachers and the learning situation of students.In response to the problems existing in the evaluation subjects,evaluation standards,and evaluation forms of course teaching evaluation in some universities,literature analysis and case analysis methods are adopted.Taking the computer practical training course of Yango University as an example,the job competency based evaluation model is borrowed,and a multi subject evaluation is introduced.With the goal of cultivating core competencies in the position,a process evaluation model is adopted to examine the achievement of course teaching objectives.The research conclusion provides reference for further improving the effectiveness of curriculum and course teaching evaluation in universities.
作者 兰石财 孙福权 何锡梗 LAN Shicai;SUN Fuquan;HE Xigeng(Academic Affairs Office,Yango University,Fuzhou 350015,China;School of Artificial Intelligence,Yango University,Fuzhou 350015,China;School of Cross Border Ecommerce,Yango University,Fuzhou 350015,China)
出处 《辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024年第2期150-154,共5页 Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Social Science Edition)
基金 福建省本科高校教育教学改革重大研究项目(FBJG20210327) 阳光学院教育发展基金资助项目(YG2022003)。
关键词 岗位能力本位 教学评价 改革 job competency based teaching evaluation reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘声涛,戴海崎,周骏.新一代测验理论—认知诊断理论的源起与特征[J].心理学探新,2006,26(4):73-77. 被引量:51
  • 2马道斯,斯塔弗尔比姆,斯克里文.方案的评价:历史的概观[G]//瞿葆奎,主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:77.
  • 3泰勒.怎样评价学习经验的效用[G]//瞿葆奎主编,陈玉琨、赵永年,选编.教育学文集(第16卷)教育评价.北京:人民教育出版社,1989:263.
  • 4Scriven,M.The methodology of evaluation [G]//Tyler R.W.,Gagne,R.M.,Scriven,M.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation.Chicago:Rand McNally, 1967:39-83.
  • 5Bloom, B.S.Some theoretical issues relating to educational eval-uation[G]//Tyler,R.W.Educational evaluation:new roles,new means:the 63rd yearbook of the National Society for the Study ofEducation(part II).Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1969:26-50.
  • 6布卢姆,等.教育评价[M].邱渊,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1981:230、259-260.
  • 7Black, P., Wiliam, D.Inside the black box: Raising standardsthrough classroom assessment[J].Phi Delta Kappan, 1998,80(2).
  • 8Crooks,T.J.The impact of classroom evaluation practices onstudents[J].Review of Educational Research, 1988, (58);Sadler,D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructionalsystems [J].Instructional Science,1989,18 (2).
  • 9Black, P, Wiliam,D.Assessment and classroom leaming[J], Assessment in Educa-tion, 1998 ,5( 1 ).
  • 10Bangert-Drowns R.L., Kulik J.A.Kulik C.C. Effects of FrequentClassroom Testing[J].The Journal of Educational Research, 1991,85(2).

共引文献471

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部