从目的论视角看梅亚苏对海德格尔的批判

Meillassoux's Criticism of Heidegger:From the Perspective of Teleology

自黑格尔以来,目的论式的哲学体系似乎已成为了历史的遗迹。然而,有趣的是,我们在海德格尔的《存在与时间》中,可以发现海德格尔围绕此在的实际性生存建构起了一种目的论式的意义世界。但同时,这一围绕此在的目的论世界如海德格尔所言,又时时遭受着偶然性的事实性世界的冲击。这样一种事实性对实际性的冲击在此后的法国哲学之中成为了哲学家们讨论的主题,当代著名的法国哲学家梅亚苏,在其代表作《有限性之后》中就接续了海德格尔的主题,将这种事实性的原理发扬光大。由此,我们也能从中看到目的论哲学在当代的命运。

After Hegel,the teleological system of philosophy seems to have become a historical relic.Still,we can discover a relatively weak teleological framework in the philosophy of the 2Oth century.In Being and Time,Heidegger constructs a teleological world of meanings around the existence of Dasein,which,at the same time,is faced with constant invasions and attacks from the factual world,just as Heidegger convincingly argued.Such an impact from factiality upon facticity has become a central topic for French philosophers since that time.The famous contemporary French philosopher Meillassoux revived Heidegger's theme in his masterpiece After Finitude,carrying forward the principle of factiality.From this,shall we witness the fate of teleological philosophy in contemporary era.