期刊文献+

健康结局指标效应量决策阈值制定方法指南

A guideline for determining the effect size decision threshold of health outcomes
原文传递
导出
摘要 临床循证决策过程中需要基于最佳证据,综合考虑干预措施利弊大小、证据确信度、成本与可行性等因素。通过制定患者健康结局指标效应量决策阈值(decision threshold of effect size,DTES),能够帮助利益相关者理解干预措施利弊大小、评估证据确信度和解读研究结果。MERGE工作组充分借鉴国际经验,通过小组讨论、半结构化访谈、专家共识和试点应用,开发了一套包括8个步骤的健康结局指标DTES制定方法指南,包括:必要性评估、组建工作组、遴选患者重要结局、基于最佳证据制作情景示例、设计专家函询问卷、分析专家涵询结果、面对面专家共识以及推广应用与后效评价。DTES指南的开发,以期为利益相关者制定不同领域健康结局指标的DTES提供方法指导。 In the clinical evidence-based decision-making process,factors including benefits and harms,evidence certainty,cost and feasibility of interventions should be considered based on the best evidence.The development of decision threshold of effect size(DTES)for patient health outcomes can help stakeholders understand the benefits and harms of interventions,assess evidence certainty,and interpret research results.Based on international experience,the MERGE Working Group through group discussions,semi-structured interviews,expert consensus,and pilot application developed a set of 8-step guidelines for the development of DTES for health outcomes.These steps included necessity assessment,formation of working groups,selection of patient important outcomes,creation of scenarios based on the best evidence,design of expert consultation questionnaires,analysis of expert consultation results,face-to-face expert consensus,dissemination of the application and reevaluation.The DTES guideline development is intended to provide methodological guidance for stakeholders to develop DTES for health outcome indicators in different domains.
作者 刘雅菲 朱鸿飞 李颖 赖鸿皓 周奇 罗旭飞 陈耀龙 邓宏勇 杜亮 靳英辉 孔德昭 黎国威 李江 李玲 廖星 刘杰 史楠楠 商洪才 田金徽 王晓辉 吴大嵘 杨丰文 杨克虎 于长禾 张家兴 赵晨 葛龙 LIU Yafei;ZHU Hongfei;LI Ying;LAI Honghao;ZHOU Qi;LUO Xufei;CHEN Yaolong;DENG Hongyong;DU Liang;JIN Yinghui;KONG Dezhao;LI Guowei;LI Jiang;LI Ling;LIAO Xing;LIU Jie;SHI Nannan;SHANG Hongcai;TIAN Jinhui;WANG Xiaohui;WU Darong;YANG Fengwen;YANG Kehu;YU Changhe;ZHANG Jiaxing;ZHAO Chen;GE Long(Department of Social Science and Health Management,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,P.R.China;National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,P.R.China;Evidence-Based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Institute of Health Data Science,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation,Lanzhou 730000,P.R.China;Chinese GRADE Center,Lanzhou 73000,P.R.China;TCM Health Collaborative Innovation Center,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203,P.R.China;Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,P.R.China;Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine,Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430071,P.R.China;Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shenyang 110032,P.R.China;Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University,Guangzhou 510317,P.R.China;Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100021,P.R.China;Institute of Basic Research in Clinical,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;Guang'anmen Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;China Center for Evidence-Based Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine),Guangzhou 510120,P.R.China;Evidence-Based Medicine Center,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,P.R.China;Department of Pharmacy,Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital,Guiyang 550002,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期405-413,共9页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:82204931) 中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费(编号:ZZ15-WT-05) 中国中医科学院科技创新工程(编号:CI2021A05502) 甘肃省科技计划资助(编号:22JR5RA733)。
关键词 效应决策阈值 核心结局指标 MERGE 方法学 Decision threshold of effect size Core outcomes MERGE Methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1艾尔·巴比.社会研究方法[M].北京:华夏出版社,2009.
  • 2GLAZER, BARNEY & ANSELM STRAUSS. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research [ M]. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. 1967.
  • 3STRAUSS, ANSELM & JULIET CORBIN. Basics of Quali- tative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Tech- niques. [ M ]. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publica- tions. 1990.
  • 4杰瑞·瑞安,拉塞尔·伯纳德.数据分析与分析方法.[M]//定性研究:经验资料收集与分析的方法.诺曼·邓津,伊冯娜·林肯.凤笑天等,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007:837.
  • 5凯西·查马兹.扎根刑沦:客观主义与建构主义方法.[M]//定性研究:策略与艺术诺曼·邓津,伊冯娜·林肯凤笑天,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007:544-574.
  • 6陈向明.教师如何作质性研究[M].北京:教育出版社,2001.
  • 7GLAZER B. Theoretical Sensibility [ M ]. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. 1978.
  • 8STRAUSS, ANSELM. Qualitative Analysis For Social Scien- tists[ M]. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1987.
  • 9陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2001..
  • 10Van der Wees PJ, Hendriks ElM, Custers JWH, et al. Comparison of international guideline programs to evaluate and update the Dutch program for clinical guideline development in physical therapy. BMC Health Serv Res, 2007, 7(1): 191.

共引文献481

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部