通谋虚伪表示不得对抗规则的内在价值与独立构成

The Intrinsic Value and Independence of Not-against Third Party Rule in Simulation

对虚伪表示人予以制裁的思想和外观主义的信赖保护观念,构成了通谋虚伪表示无效情形下善意第三人保护的两种内在价值基础。越重视制裁思想,对外观主义的信赖保护观念的接受程度越低,则通谋虚伪表示不得对抗规则相较于外观主义的诸多信赖保护制度而言就越具有独立意义。结合我国民法传统和外观主义制度体系可以发现,一方面,制裁思想在通谋虚伪相关制度构建上影响巨大;另一方面,外观主义的制度体系仍显示出谨慎保守的趋向。这就使得通谋虚伪表示不得对抗规则在我国法上具有鲜明的独立价值,其与善意取得、登记对抗、商事登记等制度在善意认定、受保护者范围的构成理解方面存在重要差别,也与非基于外观主义的登记对抗制度有显著差异。

The idea of sanctioning the lair and the concept of trust protection of appearance-ism constitute the two intrinsic value bases for the protection of third parties under simulation.The more attention is paid to the idea of sanctions,the less the concept of trust protection of appearance-ism is generally accepted,and the more independent the rule of Not-against third party rule in simulation is compared with the rule of appearance-ism,and the less it is not.Combined with the tradition of our civil law and the system of appearance-ism,it can be found that,on the one hand,the idea of sanction has a great influence on the governing of simulation,and on the other hand,the system of appearance-ism still shows a cautious and conservative tendency.As a result,the Not-against third party rule in simulation has obvious independent value,and there are important differences between it and the rule of bona fide acquisition,registration confrontation,and commercial registration in terms of the standard of good faith and the scope of protected thirdparty,and it is also significantly different from the non-appearance-based registration confrontation rule.