能源规范“入典”的立法选择与逻辑证成

Legislative Options and Logical Justification for the Incorporation of Energy Regulations into the Environmental Code

能源规范是否要纳入生态环境法典以及如何纳入是当前理论研究的热点,学界对此形成“纳入说”“不纳入说”两种主张,且两种主张产生的根源是学界对环境法和能源法之间关系的认知差异。环境法和能源法“理念不同-规制耦合”的双维关系要求确定现实问题针对性作为能源规范“入典”判断的元规则。以相对集中的形式将能源规范专章规定在“绿色低碳发展编”中符合了生态环境法典回应时代需求又增益内在体系的实践逻辑。能源规范纳入生态环境法典,对“绿色低碳发展编”以经济闭环为基础的内容架构进行重塑,形成了以“绿色低碳发展”理念为核心趋势的结构因果关系的逻辑样态。以此,生态环境法典“绿色能源”章与“绿色低碳发展编”中的其他章形式平等又实质耦合。通过能源规范“供给-结合”底层逻辑的进一步安排,最终使得“绿色低碳发展编”的宏观、中观、微观编纂逻辑得以多维呈现。

Whether and how to incorporate energy regulations into the Environmental Code is a hot topic in current theoretical research.The academic community has formed two opposite claims as"incorporation"and"not incorporation",which are rooted in the cognitive differences on the relationship between environmental law and energy law.The two-dimensional relationship hat the two laws vary in concepts but couple in regulation requires the determination of"targeted practical problems"for judging whether to corporate energy regulations into the environmental code.The relatively centralized form of the energy regulations in the"green low-carbon development chapter"is in line with the environmental code to respond to the needs of the times and gain the inner system of the practical logic.Its inclusion in the"Green and Low-Carbon Development Chapter"has reshaped the content structure based on the closed loop of the economy,forming a logical pattern of structural causality with the concept of"green and low-carbon development"as the core trend.In this way,the"green energy"chapter is formally equal and substantively coupled with other chapters in the series.Through the further arrangement of the underlying logic of"supply and integration"of energy norms,the macro,meso and micro codification logic of"green and low-carbon development"can be presented in a multi-dimensional way.