期刊文献+

腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗对卵巢癌患者预后影响的meta分析

Effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with intravenous chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价腹腔化疗(IP)联合静脉化疗(IV)对卵巢癌患者预后的影响。方法检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、中国知网,检索时间为建库至2023年1月1日,收集关于采用IP、IV治疗卵巢癌的随机对照临床试验,其中研究组采用IP联合IV方式,对照组采用单纯IV方式,分析2组无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)及不良反应发生率。结果共纳入7项研究,涉及4057例患者。meta分析结果显示,研究组PFS显著长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(HR=0.86,95%CI:0.77~0.95,P=0.004)。亚组分析结果显示,2组PFS比较,差异无统计学意义(HR=0.85,95%CI:0.68~1.05,P=0.12)。研究组OS长于对照组,差异有统计学意义(HR=0.89,95%CI:0.79~1.00,P=0.04)。研究组不良反应(≥3级)发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(HR=1.22,95%CI:1.09~1.37,P=0.0008)。亚组分析结果显示,2组胃肠道不良反应、感染和血栓发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但在血液学毒性和神经毒性发生率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论IP联合IV可以延长卵巢癌患者生存期,延缓复发时间,但需警惕重度不良反应的发生。 Objective To systematically evaluate the effect of intraperitoneal chemotherapy(IP)combined with intra venous chemotherapy(IV)on the prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer.Methods PubMe d,EMBASE,Cochrane Library and CNKI were searched from inception to January 1,2023.Randomized controlled trials about IP and IV in the treatment of ovarian cancer were collected.The study group was treated with IP combined with IV,and the control group was treated with IV alone.The progression-free survival(PFS),overall survival(OS)and the incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed.Results A total of seven studies involving 4057 patients were included.The results of meta-analysis showed that the PFS of the study group was significantly longer than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(HR=0.86,95%CI:0.77-0.95,P=0.004).The results of subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups(HR=0.85,95%CI:0.68-1.05,P=0.12).The OS of the study group was longer than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(HR=0.89,95%CI:0.79-1.00,P=0.04).The incidence of adverse reactions(≥grade 3)in the study group was lower than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(HR=1.22,95%CI:1.09-1.37,P=0.0008).The results of subgroup analysis showed that there were significant differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions,infection and thrombosis between the two groups(P<0.05).However,there was no significant difference in the incidence of hematological toxicity and neurotoxicity(P>0.05).Conclusion IP combined with IV can prolong the survival time of patients with ovarian cancer and delay the recurrence time,but it is necessary to be alert to the occurrence of severe adverse reactions.
作者 赵飞飞 郭迎雪 张婷婷 孙东斌 李方华 ZHAO Feifei;GUO Yingxue;ZHANG Tingting;SUN Dongbin;LI Fanghua(Department of Oncology,Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital,Dongying,Shandong 257000,China)
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2024年第8期1317-1322,共6页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目(202003100189)。
关键词 卵巢癌 腹腔化疗 静脉化疗 不良反应 Ovarian cancer Intraperitoneal chemotherapy Intravenous chemotherapy Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Yen MS, Twu NF, Lai CR, et al. Importance of delivered cycles and nomogram for intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol , 2009,114 (3): 415419.
  • 2Alberts OS, Liu PY ,Hannigan EV, et al. Intraperitoneal cispla?tin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cispla?tin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian canc?err]]. N EnglJ Med, 1996,335 (26): 1950-1955.
  • 3Armstrong OK, Bundy B , Wenzel L, et al. Intraperitoneal cispla?tin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer[J]. N EnglJ Med, 2006, 354 (I) : 3443.
  • 4Kirmani S, Braly PS, McClay EF, et al. A comparison of intrave?nous versus intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the initial treatment of ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1994, 54 (3): 338- 344.
  • 5Polyzos A, Tsavaris N ,Kosmas C, et al. A comparative study of intraperitoneal carboplatin versus intravenous carboplatin with in?travenous cyclophosphamide in both arms as initial chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer[J]. Oncology, 1999, 56 (4) : 291- 296.
  • 6Gadducci A, Carnino F, Chiara S, et al. Intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin in combination with intravenous cyclophos?phamide and epidoxorubicin in optimally cytoreduced advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a randomized trial of the Gruppo Onco?logico Nord-Ovest[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2000, 76 (2): 157- 162.
  • 7Markman M, Bundy BN, Alberts OS, et al. Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moder?ately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carci?noma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncolo?gy Group[J].J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19 (4) : 1001-1007.
  • 8Yen MS, luang CM, Lai CR, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin?based chemotherapy vs. intravenous cisplatin-based chemothera?py for stage III optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. IntJ Gynaecol Obstet, 2001, 72 (1) : 55-60.
  • 9Markman M. Intraperitoneal antineoplastic drug delivery: ration?ale and results[J]. Lancet Oncol , 2003, 4 (5) : 277 -283.
  • 10Ozols RF, Bookman MA, du Bois A, et al. Intraperitoneal cis?platin therapy in ovarian cancer: comparison with standard in?travenous carboplatin and paclitaxel[1J. Gynecol Oneol, 2006, 103 (1) : 1-6.

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部