期刊文献+

金融科技对银行风险承担的“双刃剑”影响——基于宏观审慎监管的调节作用 被引量:6

The“Double-edged Sword”Impact of Fintech on Banks’Risk-taking:A Test of the Moderating Effect Based on Macro-prudential Supervision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 稳妥发展金融科技,加速实现商业银行数字化转型,已成为现阶段及未来一段时间金融供给侧结构性改革的核心内容。基于金融科技的“赋能”效应和“挤出”效应,考察了宏观审慎监管下金融科技对银行风险承担的影响机制。研究发现:商业银行发展金融科技整体上能降低银行风险承担,但贷款结构调整、银行竞争程度分别在金融科技影响银行风险承担的过程中发挥着竞争性的间接作用,此外,宏观审慎监管对金融科技“赋能”效应有正向调节作用,而对金融科技“挤出”效应有反向调节作用。研究从银行成立金融科技子公司的视角出发,为商业银行发展金融科技和监管部门制定宏观审慎监管政策提供了理论探讨和经验证据。 The steady development of Fintech and the accelerated digital transformation of commercial banks have become the core elements of the supply-side structural reform of the financial industry at this stage and in the period ahead.Based on the“enabling”and“crowding out”effects of Fintech,this paper examines the impact mechanism of Fintech on banks’risk-taking under macro-prudential supervision.The study finds that commercial banks’development of Fintech reduces bank risk-taking overall,but loan restructuring and the degree of bank competition play competing indirect roles in the process of Fintech influencing bank risk-taking,respectively.In addition,macro-prudential supervision measures have a positive moderating effect on the“enabling”effect of Fintech,and a negative moderating effect on the“crowding out”effect of Fintech.Based on the perspective of banks’establishment of Fintech subsidiaries,this study provides theoretical discussion and empirical evidence for commercial banks’development of Fintech and regulators’formulation of macro-prudential supervision policies.
作者 朱诗怡 晏景瑞 Zhu Shiyi;Yan Jingrui(PBC School of Finance,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《当代经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第5期84-96,共13页 Contemporary Economic Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年项目“金融业应用替代数据的信贷效用、潜在风险及其审慎监管研究”(23YJC790212) 国家社会科学基金项目“数字金融缓解专精特新企业融资约束问题研究”(22BGL069)。
关键词 金融科技 银行风险承担 “双刃剑”影响 宏观审慎监管 Fintech bank risk-taking “double-edged sword”impact macro-prudential supervision
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献241

  • 1孟娜娜,粟勤.挤出效应还是鲶鱼效应:金融科技对传统普惠金融影响研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2020,0(1):56-70. 被引量:75
  • 2方意,赵胜民,谢晓闻.货币政策的银行风险承担分析——兼论货币政策与宏观审慎政策协调问题[J].管理世界,2012,28(11):9-19. 被引量:233
  • 3何青青,陈艺璇,曹前进.商业银行资本结构对流动性创造的影响[J].金融论坛,2015,20(3):50-61. 被引量:22
  • 4Angelini, P. ; Neri, S. and Panetta, F. "The Interaction between Capital Requirements and Monetary Policy. "Jour- nal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2014, 46(6), pp. 1073-1112.
  • 5Angelini, P. ; Enria, A. ; Neri, S. ; Panetta, F. and Quagliariello, M. "Pro-cyclicality of Capital Regulation: Is It a Problem? How to Fix It? " Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area, 2010.
  • 6Angeloni, I. and Faia, E. "Capital Regulation and Monetary Policy with Fragile Banks. "Journal of Monetary Eco- nomics, 2013, 60(3) , pp. 311-324.
  • 7Bernanke, B. S. ; Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. "The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Frame- work. "Handbook of Macroeconomics, 1999,1, pp. 1341 - 1393.
  • 8Carrera, C. and Vega, H. "Interbank Market and Macroprudential Tools in a DSGE Model. " https://www, bis. org/ events/ccaconf2012/carrera, pdf, 2012.
  • 9Christensen, I. ; Meh, C. and Moran, K. "Bank Leverage Regulation and Macroeconomic Dynamics. " Bank of Can- ada working paper No. 2011-32,2011.
  • 10De Resende, C. ; Dib, A. ; Lalonde, R. and Perevalov, N. "Countercyclical Bank Capital Requirement and Opti- mized Monetary Policy Rules. " Bank of Canada working paper No. 2013-8, 2013.

共引文献1401

同被引文献81

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部