行政协议单方解除权的实施困境与法治化路径

The Implement Dilemma and the Legalization Path of Unilateral Termination Power in Administrative Agreements

在现代行政法治框架下,行政协议不仅是行政机构与协议相对人共同推动国家行政治理的关键工具,在行政职能转型的历史进程中也扮演着至关重要的角色。在司法实践中,针对行政机关单方解除权纠纷中存在的公共利益标准界定不明、裁判不一、救济不完全等实践困境,提出应对其规范要件进行检视与辨明,从利益平衡、多元探索以及程序规制三个视角出发,通过比例原则的认定来识别解除权行使的标准,并利用多渠道实质性化解协议纠纷。同时,还应坚持主体协商与合理听证的程序规制,进而探寻行政协议单方解除权的法治化实现路径。

Under the framework of modern administrative rule of law,administrative agreements are not only key tools for administrative institutions and counterpart parties to jointly promote national administrative governance,but also play a crucial role in the historical process of administrative function transformation.In judicial practice,there are practical dilemmas in the disputes of unilateral termination rights involving administrative agencies,such as unclear definition of public interest standards,inconsistent judgments,and incomplete remedies.The article examines and distinguishes its normative elements from three perspectives:interest balance,diversified exploration,and procedural regulation.Through the recognition of the principle of proportionality,it identifies the standards for exercising the right to terminate agreements,and uses multiple channels to substantially resolve agreement disputes.At the same time,it proposes procedural regulations that adhere to subject negotiation and reasonable hearing,and then explores the path to legalize the unilateral right to terminate administrative agreements.