期刊文献+

腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口漏的危险因素分析及其对患者预后和生活质量(QLICP-CR)的影响

Analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer and its influence on prognosis and quality of life(QLICP-CR)of patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘(Anastomotic Leakage,AL)的危险因素,为临床有效预防腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL提供理论依据,并进一步探索AL对患者预后和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2017年1月—2020年12月皖南医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科收治的394例行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术患者的临床资料,将其按是否发生术后吻合口瘘分成无吻合口瘘(无AL组,359例)和吻合口瘘组(AL组35例)两组。采用单因素分析和多因素二元Logistic回归分析探寻术后AL独立的危险因素。根据可能会影响患者术后生存的因素,将无AL组和AL组进行1︰1倾向性得分匹配(PSM),再采用Kaplan-Meier法比较匹配组和匹配后AL组患者术后3年的总生存率、局部复发率、远处转移率。对于生存时间满3年的匹配组和匹配后AL组的患者,进行癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系QLICP(Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients)中的大肠癌CR(Colorectal Cancer)量表第二版(简称为QLICP-CR(V2.0))评分,比较两组患者生命质量差异。结果单因素和多因素logistic分析发现患者男性(OR:2.680,95%CI:1.098~6.540),术前接受新辅助治疗(OR:5.109,95%CI:2.347~11.118),术前白蛋白<35 g/L(OR:3.269,95%CI:1.507~7.090),肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm(OR:3.330,95%CI:1.448~7.657)是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier法分析显示,AL并不影响患者的3年总生存率(78.8%vs 75.8%,P=0.752)、3年局部复发率(9.1%vs 18.2%,P=0.285)、3年远处转移率(12.1%vs 15.2%,P=0.726)。AL患者在心理功能中的情绪侧面(P=0.029)、大肠特异模块中的大便情况侧面(P=0.039)评分显著降低。结论男性、术前接受新辅助治疗、术前白蛋白<35 g/L、肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。AL不影响腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术预后。AL会对患者带来情绪、大便情况上的不良影响。 Objective To analyze the risk factors of anastomotic leakage(AL)after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer,so as to provide theoretical basis for effective prevention of AL after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer,and to further explore its influence on the prognosis and quality of life of patients.Methods The clinical data of 394 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.According to the occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage,they were divided into two groups:the no anastomotic leakage group and the anastomotic leakage group(no AL group and AL group).Univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to explore the independent risk factors of postoperative AL.According to the factors that may affect the postoperative survival,1︰1 propensity score matching(PSM)was performed between the non-AL group and the AL group,and the 3-year overall survival rate,local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate of the matched group and the post-matched AL group were compared by Kaplan-Meier method.For patients with a survival duration of over 3 years in both the matched group and the post-matched AL group,assessments were conducted by the second edition of the Colorectal Cancer scale within the quality of life instruments for cancer patients(QLICP)system(abbreviated as QLICP-CR(V2.0)),and the differences of quality of life between the two groups were compared.Results Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis showed that male patients(OR:2.680,95%CI:1.098~6.540),received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy(OR:5.109,95%CI:2.347~11.118),preoperative albumin less than 35g/L(OR:3.269,95%CI:1.507~7.090)and distance from tumor to anal margin less than 7cm(OR:3.330,95%CI:1.448~7.657)were the independent risk factors for AL after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AL did not affect the 3-year overall survival rate(78.8%vs 75.8%,P=0.752),3-year local recurrence rate(9.1%vs 18.2%,P=0.285),and 3-year distant metastasis rate(12.1%vs 15.2%,P=0.726).Patients with anastomotic leakage demonstrated significantly lower scores in the emotional aspect of psychological function(P=0.029)and the stool condition aspect of the colorectal-specific module(P=0.039).Conclusions The independent risk factors of AL after laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer are male,preoperative neoadjuvant therapy,preoperative albumin less than 35g/L,tumor distance from anal margin less than 7cm.AL does not affect the prognosis of laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.AL imparts adverse effects on patients,affecting aspects such as emotion and stool condition.
作者 邾磊 王耀 汪进国 Zhu Lei;Wang Yao;Wang Jinguo(School of Postgraduate,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu,Anhui 241000,China;Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital(Yijishan Hospital)of Wannan Medical College,Wuhu,Anhui 241000,China)
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2024年第8期721-730,共10页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术 吻合口瘘 危险因素 倾向性得分匹配 生存分析 QLICP-CR Laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer Anastomotic leakage Risk factors Propensity score matching Survival analysis QLICP-CR
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献199

  • 1李干斌,韩加刚,王振军,魏广辉,渠浩,翟志伟,易秉强,马华崇,杨勇,王建良,李竹林.新辅助放化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌疗效分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2021,41(2):184-189. 被引量:16
  • 2Se-Jin Baek,Jin Kim,Jungmyun Kwak,Seon-Hahn Kim.Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(32):5309-5313. 被引量:20
  • 3Seung-Yong Jeong,Ji Won Park,Byung Ho Nam,Sohee Kim,Sung-Bum Kang,Seok-Byung Lim,Hyo Seong Choi,Duck-Woo Kim,Hee Jin Chang,Dae Yong Kim,Kyung Hae Jung,Tae-You Kim,Gyeong Hoon Kang,Eui Kyu Chie,Sun Young Kim,Dae Kyung Sohn,Dae-Hyun Kim,Jae-Sung Kim,Hye Seung Lee,Jee Hyun Kim,Jae Hwan Oh.Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet Oncology . 2014 (7)
  • 4Branagan G, Finnis D; Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2005,48:1021- 1026.
  • 5Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking [J]. Arch Surg, 2003,138: 1334-1338.
  • 6Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ, et al. Impact of the introduction and training of total mesoreetal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands[J]. Br J Surg, 2002,89: 1142-1149.
  • 7Heald RJ. The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery[J]. J R Soc Med, 1988,81 : 503-508.
  • 8Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotie leakage in eolorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients [J]. World J Surg, 2011,35: 186-195.
  • 9Smith JD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, et al. Anastomotic leak is not associated with oncologic outcome in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer [J]. Ann Surg, 2012,256: 1034-1038.
  • 10Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51 : 902-908.

共引文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部