医疗资源资本化效应及其异质性研究--基于哈尔滨市传染病医院与全科三甲医院的对比分析

A research on the capitalization effects of medical resources and their heterogeneity:Competitive analysis based on the infectious hospital and general 3A hospitals in Harbin

受新型冠状病毒感染冲击以及我国人口老龄化程度加深的影响,医疗资源的分布与质量成为影响住宅价格的重要因素,从而产生了医疗资源资本化效应。通过问卷调查,分析了城市居民对哈尔滨市传染病医院与全科三甲医院两种医疗资源的偏好差异。基于分位数回归模型与交互效应检验,深入探讨了医疗资源资本化效应的空间异质性、社会异质性以及两种医疗资源的同质性。结果表明:(1)传染病医院抑制了附近的住宅价格,全科三甲医院提升了附近的住宅价格,且随着距离的增加,两种医疗资源的资本化效应均逐渐减弱;(2)中等价位住宅对与传染病医院的距离更敏感,随着住宅价格的提高,全科三甲医院的资本化效应逐渐增强;(3)两种医疗资源具有交互资本化效应,住宅与全科三甲医院临近增强了传染病医院的邻避效应。

With the impact of the epidemic and the deepening of population aging in China,the distribution and quality of medical resources have become important factors affecting housing prices,gradually generating the capitalization effects of medical resources.In this study,the differences in the resident's preference for the infectious hospital and general 3A hospitals in Harbin were explored in depth through a questionnaire survey and a comparative analysis of their capitalization effects.Furthermore,the social heterogeneity of the capitalization effects of medical resources and the homogeneity of the two kinds of medical resources were analyzed based on quantile regression models and interaction effects tests.The results show that(1)the infectious hospital depresses the prices of nearby housings,and general 3A hospitals increase the prices of nearby housings.The capitalization effect of both medical resources gradually decreases with increasing distance.(2)Medium-priced housings are more sensitive to the proximity of the infectious hospital,and the capitalization effect of general 3A hospitals gradually increases as the price of housings increases.(3)There is an interaction between the capitalization effects of the two kinds of medical resources,and the proximity of general 3A hospitals enhances the NIMBY(not in my backyard)effect of infectious hospitals.