摘要
在哲学和史学等领域,董仲舒研究已然成果丰硕。2023年出版的黄铭《推何演董:董仲舒〈春秋〉学研究》一书,则明确回到传统经学研究的视角,为我们揭开了董仲舒的另一个面相。《春秋》是属辞比事之学,故黄铭认为辞例是理解《春秋》的不二法门。董仲舒作为汉代景、武之际的《春秋》学博士,但董生《春秋繁露》中的辞例向来不受重视,因此不同于以往研究,黄铭首先梳理董仲舒的辞例,并以之为统贯董氏《春秋》学的纲领。同时,何休《公羊解诂》作为两汉唯一一套完善的《春秋》辞例之学,必须依托何休才能更好地理解董仲舒,此即黄铭所谓“推何演董”。诚然,回到经学研究的视野中,何休便是董仲舒研究最重要的参考坐标,但在何休的观照下,董仲舒的《春秋》决狱以及天哲学等问题会出现一定程度的历史偏差,值得我们进一步省察。
In the fields of philosophy and history,Dong Zhongshu has achieved fruitful research results.However,Huang Ming's book“Tui He Yan Dong:Dong Zhongshu's Study of Spring and Autumn Annals”,published in 2023,clearly returns to the perspective of traditional Confucian studies and reveals another aspect of Dong Zhongshu.Huang Ming believes that examples are the grand road to understanding the Spring and Autumn Annals,and Dong Zhongshu is first and foremost a doctor in the study of the Spring and Autumn Annals.Therefore,it is necessary to rely on He Xiu to better understand Dong Zhongshu.Admittedly,He Xiu should serve as a reference frame for Dong Zhongshu's research,but under his observation,Huang Ming made unusual judgments on Dong Zhongshu's Spring and Autumn Annals sentencing and philosophical issues,which are worth further investigation.
出处
《国际儒学（中英文）》
2024年第1期171-177,190,共8页
International Studies on Confucianism
