摘要
海源阁本旧藏宋版《淮南子》现存于俄罗斯国立图书馆,其上钤印累累,今根据印章推断出此宋本《淮南子》的递藏源流。现今流传的《四部丛刊》本《淮南子》实际上源于海源阁宋本,自《四部丛刊》本《淮南子》出版后,刘履芬影钞本即成为研究《淮南子》的主要参考宋本。但毕竟不是原本,其中多有谬误。现将海源阁本与《四部丛刊》本《淮南子》比勘,发现《四部丛刊》本存在误字和补写现象,海源阁本为校勘今本《淮南子》提供了不少异文,具有一定的校勘价值。
The Song Dynasty version of Huainanzi that Haiyuan Pavilion once collected is now housed in the Russian National Library,with many seals on it.Based on the seals,the collection origin of this Song Dynasty version of Huainanzi can be inferred.The current circulating version of Huainanzi in the Si Bu Cong Kan actually originated from the Song Dynasty version of Haiyuan Ge.Since the publication of the Huainanzi in the Si Bu Cong Kan version,the Liu Lufen film banknote version has become the main reference for scholars to study Huainanzi in the Song Dynasty.But after all,it is not the original,and there are many fallacies in it.Now comparing the Haiyuan Pavilion edition with the Si Bu Cong Kan edition Huainanzi,it is found that there are errors and additions in the Si Bu Cong Kan edition.The Huainanzi Pavilion edition provides many variant texts for the current edition Huainanzi,which has important comparative value.
出处
《淮南师范学院学报》
2024年第2期34-40,共7页
Journal of Huainan Normal University
关键词
《淮南子》
海源阁
宋本
Huainanzi
Haiyuan Pavilion
edition printed in the Song dynasty