期刊文献+

论夫妻共同财产制下直播打赏返还的实现路径

Implementation Path for the Return of Live Streaming Rewards Under the Marital Property System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在用户配偶主张直播打赏返还的案件中,返还责任主体及返还依据都面临适用难题。主播作为打赏法律关系主体,能够成为打赏返还责任主体。返还基础是基于无权处分的不当得利,即用户无权处分夫妻共同财产致使平台无权保有虚拟财产给付。无处分权的认定关键是确认打赏行为是否为了家庭日常生活需要。打赏行为目的及打赏数额占比是认定家庭日常生活需要的考量因素。充值不退条款是否有效不影响用户配偶的返还请求。不当得利认定后,平台向主播负有返还责任,可以作为主播返还义务的履行辅助人。 In the case where the user’s spouse claims the return of live streaming rewards,the subject of the return responsibility and the basis of the return face application challenges.As the subject of the legal relationship of reward,the live streamer can become the subject of the responsibility of reward return.The basis of the return is based on the unjust enrichment due to unauthorized disposition,which means that the user has no right to dispose of the joint property of the couple,and the platform has no right to keep the virtual property provided.The key to the determination of unauthorized disposition is to confirm whether the reward behavior is for the daily needs of the family life.The purpose of the reward and the proportion of the amount of reward are factors to be considered in determining the daily needs of the family life.Whether the non-refundable recharge clause is valid does not influence the return request of the user’s spouse.After the identification of unjust enrichment,the platform shall be responsible for the return to the live streamer,and can serve as the assistant to fulfill the return obligation of the live streamer.
作者 刘海安 李竺阳 Liu Hai’an;Li Zhuyang(School of Law,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;School of Law and Economics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 2024年第3期193-203,共11页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基金 天津市哲学社会科学基金项目(TJFX23-005).
关键词 直播打赏 返还 夫妻共同财产 家庭日常生活需要 live streaming reward return marital property daily needs of the family life
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献229

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部