期刊文献+

Private information and investment-q sensitivity:Evidence from new products

原文传递
导出
摘要 This study shows that a decline in investment efficiency due to information asymmetry may not necessarily devalue a firm but may enhance its value instead.Firms base their investment decisions on both public and private information.However,effectively transmitting private information to investors in a competitive market is quite challenging,as it leads to stock prices inadequately reflecting a firm’s true value.Simultaneously,firms must invest to achieve their business objectives,which results in a deviation between a firm’s actual investment level and the market’s expected investment level,thereby reducing investment-q sensitivity.However,this deviation does not imply a waste of societal resources;instead,it improves a firm’s core competitiveness in the product market.We consider the future launch of new products as a proxy for firm private information.We find that(1)private information is negatively associated with investment-q sensitivity,and that the greater the sales of the new product,the lower the investment-q sensitivity;(2)the negative effect is more pronounced for firms with higher revenue volatility and ownership concentration than for those with lower revenue volatility and ownership concentration.This study helps us to further understand how to evaluate firm investment efficiency from the perspective of private information and provides empirical evidence of the costs of the new product launch process.
出处 《China Journal of Accounting Research》 2024年第1期28-44,共17页 中国会计学刊(英文版)
基金 the National Science Foundation of China for its support(No.71632006)and(No.72072107).
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献63

  • 1徐涛.中国货币政策的行业效应分析[J].世界经济,2007,30(2):23-31. 被引量:39
  • 2[5]Aboody, D., B. Lev. The Value Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement) 1998
  • 3[6]Amir, E., B. Lev. Value- relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1996
  • 4[7]Abraham, T., B. Sidhu. The role of R&D capitalizations in firm valuation and performance, University of New South Wales, 1997
  • 5[8]Scheutze, W. ,What is an asset? Accounting Horizons,1993
  • 6[1]Cohen, W. ,D. Levinthal. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D- - Implications for the analysis of R&D investment. Economics Journal, 1989
  • 7[2][3,9]Lev, B. ,P. Zarowin. The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them. Journal of Accounting Research, 1999
  • 8[4]Lev, B., Sougiannis, T. The capitalization, amortization, and Value - relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1996
  • 9杨华军,胡奕明.制度环境与自由现金流的过度投资[J].管理世界,2007,23(9):99-106. 被引量:240
  • 10靳庆鲁、肖土盛、陈信元,2012a:《产品市场竞争、公司投资与增长/清算期权价值》,CFRN工作论文,CFRN: http://www. cfm.com.cn/getPaper.do. id :3532.

共引文献613

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部