期刊文献+

基于AHP法的城市口袋公园环境恢复性评价体系构建研究

Research on the Construction of Environmental Restoration Evaluation System of Urban Pocket Parks Based on AHP
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了评估城市口袋公园环境的恢复性效益,本文通过对国内外的文献研究、大众问卷以及专家意见征询筛选出相关影响因子,再采用AHP法(层次分析法)构建了一个包含自然环境、公共设施、空间构成、心理感知四个准则层,以及包含水体、景观品质、植物品种丰富度等21个指标层的城市口袋公园恢复性评价体系.同时,通过判断矩阵计算出各指标的权重.结果表明:准则层中权重最高的是心理感知,其中空间可达性是影响口袋公园环境恢复性评价的最重要因素,环境卫生条件、场地归属感、休息设施等是重要的具体因子层因素.本研究为今后城市口袋公园景观设计与环境恢复性效益提升提供了参考依据. In order to evaluate the restorative benefits of urban pocket park environment,this study selects relevant influencing factors through literature research at home and abroad,public questionnaires and expert consultation,and then uses AHP(analytic Hierarchy Process)to construct a recovery evaluation system of urban pocket parks with criterion layer including natural environment,public facilities,space composition and psychological perception and 21 indexes including water body,landscape quality and plant variety richness.At the same time,the weight of each index is calculated by the judgment matrix.The results show that(l)psychological perception is the most important factor in the criterion layer,and spatial accessibility is the most important factor affecting the environmental recovery evaluation of pocket parks;(2)Environmental health conditions,site belonging and rest facilities are important factors in the specific factor layer.This study provides a reference for landscape design and environmental restoration of urban pocket parks in the future.
作者 李如兰 王晔
出处 《包装与设计》 2024年第2期104-105,共2页 Package & Design
关键词 口袋公园 AHP 评价体系 恢复性 pocket park AHP evaluation system recovery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and Natural Environments (pp. 85-125). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • 2Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, H(3), 201-230.
  • 3Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35,151-175.
  • 4Zuckerman, M. (1977). Development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 513-523.
  • 5韩可宗 王孟瑜 何秀玉.自然环境对自闭症儿童影响之初探:家长及导师访谈结果[J].造园景观学报,2007,4(1):1-19.
  • 6Bagot. K. L. (2004). Perceived restorative components: A scale for children. Children, Youth and Environments, 14(1), 108-129.
  • 7Bagot, K. L. (2007). Amendments to the perceived restorative components scale for Children. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 124 -127.
  • 8Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259.
  • 9Berto, R. (2007). Assessing the restorative value of the environment: A study on the elderly in comparison with young adults and adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 42(5), 331-341.
  • 10Berto, R., Massaccesi, S., & Pasini, M. (2008), Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis of Environmental Psychology, 28(2):18 -191.

共引文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部