广东省医学科研不端行为的"灰色地带"调研及策略分析

Research and strategy analysis on the″grey zone″of medical research misconduct in Guangdong Province

目的很多科研行为处于灰色地带,既非完全符合科研诚信标准,也未达到明显的违规程度。这些行为对构建健康的科研学风和作风有着潜在的巨大危害。本研究旨在通过调查广东公立医院医务人员对科研不端行为的"灰色地带"的认知情况,提出注重建立和完善以科学精神为核心的科学道德价值体系,进一步规范我国科研的作风和学风。方法随机选取广东省30家高水平医院,借助调查问卷采集数据,应用多元统计分析的方法,选取12个自变量对涉及医学科研不端的"灰色地带"的行为进行分析,包括变量的描述性统计分析、变量的相关性分析和变量的多元线性回归分析。结果广东医务人员对不合适的数据操作或表述、自我剽窃的行为等5个变量了解较为熟悉,对不符合自己假说的数据的处理、与自己结论有冲突的结果的处理等7个变量了解相对不足。12个自变量均与科研"灰色地带"的认知情况在P<0.01的水平上有关系,具有统计学意义,且均为正相关。医学科技工作者的学历、职称对医学科研"灰色地带"行为有显著影响,不合适的数据操作或表述、对不符合自己假说的数据的处理、对与自己结论有冲突的结果的处理、自我剽窃的行为、论文参与者的贡献的量化、评审信息泄露这6个变量对医学科研"灰色地带"行为有显著影响,且呈正相关。结论广东公立医院医务人员对科研不端行为的"灰色地带"的认知较为乐观,希望可以继续深入践行良好作风学风、加强其科研诚信建设,同时也呼吁医学科技工作者要严格遵照诚信要求,秉着科学、规范、实事求是的原则开展医学科研活动,坚决不行走在科研不端行为的"灰色地带"。

Objective Purpose Many scientific research activities are in a gray area,neither fully meeting the standards of scientific integrity nor achieving significant levels of violation.These behaviors have potential huge hazards for building a healthy research style and work style.By investigating the cognitive situation of medical staff in public hospitals in Guangdong regarding the″gray zone″of scientific misconduct,it is proposed to focus on establishing and improving a scientific moral value system centered on scientific spirit,further standardizing the style and style of research in China,and promoting the improvement of China’s scientific and technological innovation level.Methods By designing and distributing survey questionnaires to collect data,and using multivariate statistical analysis,12 independent variables were selected to analyze the behavior of″gray areas″related to medical research misconduct,including descriptive analysis,correlation analysis,and multiple linear regression analysis.Results Guangdong medical staff were relatively familiar with 5 variables such as inappropriate data manipulation or expression,and self plagiarism behavior,while they had relatively insufficient understanding of 7 variables such as the processing of data that did not conform to their own hypotheses and the processing of results that conflict with their own conclusions.All 12 independent variables are statistically significant and positively correlated with the cognitive status of the″gray zone″in scientific research at the P<0.01 level.Educational background and professional title of medical technology workers have a significant impact on the″gray zone″behavior of medical research.Improper data manipulation or expression,processing of data that does not conform to one's own hypothesis,processing of results that conflict with one′s own conclusions,self plagiarism behavior,quantification of the contributions of paper participants The six variables of review information leakage have a significant impact and a positive correlation on the″gray zone″behavior of medical research.Conclusions Continuously strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity,deeply practice good work style and academic style,call for adhering to the requirements of scientific research integrity,responsible conduct of medical research activities,and resist academic misconduct and problematic misconduct in the gray area.