心肺康复治疗对冠心病患者的影响分析

Analysis of the Effects of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Therapy on Coronary Heart Disease Patients

目的:分析心肺康复治疗对冠心病患者的影响。方法:选取2021年9月—2023年9月于博鳌一龄生命养护中心就诊的冠心病患者84例作为研究对象,按照随机分组法分为对照组和观察组,各42例。对照组给予常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予心肺康复治疗。比较两组干预前后心肺功能指标[最大氧脉搏(VO_(2)/HR)、最大摄氧量(VO_(2max))、最大通气量(MVV)]、明尼苏达心力衰竭生命质量量表评分。结果:治疗前,两组VO_(2)/HR、VO_(2max)、MVV比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组VO_(2)/HR、VO_(2max)、MVV高于治疗前,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组身体领域、情绪领域、其他领域评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组身体领域、情绪领域、其他领域评分低于对照组,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:心肺康复治疗冠心病的效果较好,可提高患者心肺功能及生活质量。

Objective:To analyze the effects of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation on patients with coronary heart disease.Methods:Eighty-four patients with coronary heart disease who attended Boao Yiling Life Care Center from September 2021 to September 2023 were selected as the study subjects,and were divided into control group and observation group according to the randomized grouping method,each with forty-two cases.The control group was given conventional treatment,and the observation group was given cardiopulmonary rehabilitation treatment on the basis of the control group.The cardiopulmonary function indexes[maximal oxygen pulse rate(VO_(2)/HR),maximal oxygen uptake(VO_(2max)),maximal ventilation(MVV)],and Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of Life Scale scores were compared before and after the intervention in the two groups.Results:Before treatment,VO_(2)/HR,VO_(2max),and MVV were compared between the two groups,and the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05);after treatment,VO_(2)/HR,VO_(2max),and MVV were higher than before treatment in the two groups,and higher in the observation group than in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,the scores of physical domain,emotional domain,and other domains of the two groups were compared,and the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);after treatment,the scores of physical domain,emotional domain,and other domains of the two groups were lower than those of the control group,and the observation group was lower than the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation is more effective in the treatment of coronary heart disease,and can improve patients'cardiopulmonary function and quality of life.