期刊文献+

科学论证学习模型的建构与实践建议

Construction and Enlightenment of Scientific Argumentation for Learning Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论证与学习科学的交织研究已成为国际科学教育领域的代表性进展之一。我国科学教育领域近十年来正逐步形成“论证教与学”的研究新热点,但当前研究普遍关注“学习论证”,忽视“论证学习”。基于学习科学在科学论证方向的新近研究成果,从论证学习的核心与本质、结构与内容、途径与方法、成果与价值四个方面建构了科学论证学习模型。依据该模型与国内外关于论证学习的实证研究成果,提出了在理科教学中加强论证学习的三条建议:凸显学习中心,精选论证内容;把握论证要素,创设学习环境;聚焦素养要求,评价学习成果。 The mutual research of argumentation and learning science has become one of the representative developments in international science education.In the past decade.China lias gradually formed a new research hot spot of"argumentation of teaching and learning".However,current research generally focuses on"learning to argue"hut neglects"arguing to learn".Based on new achievement of learning science in scientific argumentation,this paper constructs scientific argumentation for learning model from the aspects of core and essence,constituent elements and content.methods and approaches,and outcomes and values.Based on this model and achievement of arguing to learn at home and abroad,three suggestions for strengthening arguing to learn are proposed in science teaching;highlighting learning center and carefully demonstrating content,grasping the elements of argumentation and creating learning environment,and focusing on competency requirement and evaluating learning results.
作者 马永双 章之畅 Ma Yongshuang;Zhang Zhichang
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第4期125-132,共8页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 吉林省教育科学“十三五”规划课题“STEM教师教育核心课程群建设研究”(GH19380)。
关键词 科学论证 科学论证学习 模型建构 初中物理 scientific argumentation scientific argumentation for learning model construction middle school physics
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

  • 1National Research Council.A Framework for K-12 Seience Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas [M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2012.30,42-44 ,44,45.
  • 2National Research Council.National Science Education Standards[S].Washington,D.C.:The National Academies Press,1996. 23,105.
  • 3C.R.Mann.The Interpretation of the College Entrance Examination Board's New Definition of the Requirement in Physies [J].Educational Review,1909(7).
  • 4John Dewey,Science as Subject-Matter and as Method[J].Science,1910, (1).
  • 5John Dewey.How We Think[M].Lexington,MA:Heath,1910.72.
  • 6Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society .General Education in a Free Society:Report of the Harvard Committee[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1945.158.
  • 7John Dewey. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process[M].Boston,MA:D.C.Heath and Company,1933.115-116.
  • 8Jerome Bruner.Process of Education[M].Boston,MA:Harbard University Press,1961.14.
  • 9Hammer. D..et al.Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students Abilities [A].R.Duschl & R.Grandy.Teaching Scientific INquiry [C].Rotterdam,The Netherlands:Sense Publishers,2005.138-156.
  • 10周玉芝.美国新版K-12科学教育框架对我国基础教育阶段科学教育的启示[J].课程.教材.教法,2012,32(6):120-124. 被引量:30

共引文献134

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部