期刊文献+

科学论证:多维能力模型与育人价值表征

Scientific Argumentation:Multi-Dimensional Capability Model and Educational Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学论证是一项重要的科学实践活动,兼具认知实践、社会实践和话语实践的特征,与科学探究、科学推理以及批判性思维等科学实践或高阶思维活动既有联系又有区别。科学论证的能力模型可以从观念态度、认知以及社会与情感等维度加以建构,同时,这些能力维度也表征了科学论证的育人价值。在课堂教学中,教师可以通过交织论证实践的认知与情感、创设论证课堂的规范与文化、联动论证测评的过程与结果等途径实现科学论证的育人价值。 Scientific argumentation is an important scientific practice that has the characteristics of cognitive,social and discourse practice.It is both related to and different from scientific practices or high-level thinking activities such as scientific inquiry,scientific reasoning and critical thinking.Scientific argumentation capability model can be constructed from dimensions such as deology and attitude.cognition,and society and emotion.At the same time these dimensions also represent the educational value of scientific argumentation.In classroom teaching.the educational value can be achieved by interweaving the cognitive and emotional aspects of scientific argumentation,creating norm and culture of argumentative classroom.and linking the process and result of argumentative assessment.
作者 张景璐 于海波 吕艳坤 Zhang Jinglu;Yu Haibo;Lv Yankun
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 北大核心 2024年第5期124-131,共8页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 国家留学基金委2018年度“国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目”(201806620002) 江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划高校青年教师专项课题“‘立德树人’背景下科学论证育人功能的内涵和实现策略研究”(JS/2023/ZX040508020)。
关键词 科学论证 观念态度 社会情感 科学实践 育人价值 scientific argumentation ideobgy and attitude social emotion scientific practice educational value
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献79

  • 1刘志,朱锐锐,樊梦婷.国际视域下学生社会与情感能力培养的趋势及启示——基于OECD国家教育政策文本的分析[J].全球教育展望,2021,50(5):29-44. 被引量:11
  • 2徐小燕,张进辅.巴昂的情绪智力模型及情商量表简介[J].心理科学,2002,25(3):332-335. 被引量:54
  • 3Morrell.P.D.& Ledennan.N.G.1998.Students'attitudes toward school and classroom science:Are theydifferent phenomena? School Science and Mathematics.1998.98 (2):76-83.
  • 4Stuesy.C.Path Analysis:A Model for the Development of Scientific Reasoninghg Abilities in Adolescents.Journal of Researeh in Science Teaching 1984,26(1):41-53
  • 5Klahr,D.,& Dunbar,K,Dual search since during scientific reasoning.Cognitive Science.1988,12:1-48.
  • 6Klahr,D.Exploring science:.The cognition and development of discovery processes.Cambridge:MA:MIT Press,2000.
  • 7Keys,C.W.The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills in Coniunotion with Collaborative Writing Assignments:An lnterprtive Study of Six Ninth-Grade Students Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1994.31(9):1003-1022.
  • 8Schauble.L.,Glaser.R.Duschl.R.A.,& Schtdze,S.Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of expermentafion in the science classroom.Journal of the Learning Sciences.1995.4:131-166.
  • 9Siowiaczek.L.M..Klayman,J.,Sherman,S.J..Skov.R.B.information selection and use in hupothesis testing:What is a good question,and what is a good answer? Memory and Cognition,1992.20(4):392-405.
  • 10Hatano,G..& Inagaki,K.Young children's naive theory of bioiogy.Cognition.1994,56:171-188.

共引文献165

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部