应用瑞加诺生负荷D-SPECT评价定量血流分数在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用

Evaluating the role of quantitative flow ratio in percutaneous coronary intervention using regadenoson stress D-SPECT

目的应用瑞加诺生负荷动态单光子发射计算机断层扫描(dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography,D-SPECT)评价定量血流分数(quantitative flow ratio,QFR)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)中的作用。方法选择2021年6月31日至2023年6月31日在河北医科大学第一医院心内科住院行择期PCI术的200例不稳定型心绞痛患者,年龄(57.56±8.23)岁,按照随机数字表法分为常规组(n=100)和QFR组(n=100),试验采用双盲法进行。常规组根据医师经验行PCI术治疗,QFR组根据QFR测定结果行PCI治疗。所有入选患者术前及PCI术后7 d,应用瑞加诺生负荷D-SPECT,分别采集短轴、垂直长轴、水平长轴的图像,计算心肌17节段分布下心肌灌注总积分、心肌缺血总节段数情况。结果PCI术前两组患者心肌缺血节段数(7.59±3.14 vs.7.48±3.36,P=0.811)、心肌灌注总积分(15.87±7.61 vs.15.63±5.97,P=0.860)差异无统计学意义,QFR组PCI术后7 d的心肌缺血节段数(5.58±3.36 vs.6.51±2.14,P=0.020)和心肌灌注总积分(10.55±4.41 vs.12.96±6.50,P=0.002)显著优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论应用QFR指导PCI可以更好改善患者心肌缺血程度。

Objective To evaluate the role of quantitative flow ratio(QFR)in percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)by using regadenoson stress dynamic single-photon emission computed tomography(D-SPECT).Methods We selected 200 patients with unstable angina admitted to Department of Cardiology,Hebei Medical University First Hospital,from June 31,2021 to June 31,2023 for elective PCI.The patients were aged 57.56±8.23 years and were randomly divided into a conventional group(n=100)and a QFR group(n=100)according to a random number table.The trial was conducted using a double-blind method.The conventional group received PCI treatment based on the experience of the physician,while the QFR group received PCI treatment based on the QFR measurement results.All enrolled patients underwent pre-operative and 7-day post-operative D-SPECT stress imaging using regadenoson stress D-SPECT,and their images were acquired from short axis,vertical long axis,and horizontal long axis to calculate the total myocardial perfusion score and the total myocardial ischemia segment number under the distribution of 17 myocardial segments.Results There was no significant difference in the number of myocardial ischemia segments(7.59±3.14 vs.7.48±3.36,P=0.811)or the total myocardial perfusion score(15.87±7.61 vs.15.63±5.97,P=0.860)between the two groups before PCI.The number of myocardial ischemia segments(5.58±3.36 vs.6.51±2.14,P=0.020)and the total myocardial perfusion score(10.55±4.41 vs.12.96±6.50,P=0.002)in the QFR group were significantly better than those in the conventional group 7 days after PCI(P<0.05).Conclusion Applying QFR guidance for PCI can better improve the degree of myocardial ischemia in patients.