内镜下黏膜切除术与圈套器冷切除术治疗结肠息肉患者的效果对比

Comparison on Effects between Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Cold Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of Patients with Colon Polyps

目的对比内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)与圈套器冷切除术(CSP)治疗结肠息肉患者的效果。方法选择2022年1月至2023年6月我院收治的结肠息肉患者78例,随机分为两组各39例。对照组行EMR治疗,观察组行CSP治疗。比较两组息肉切除效果、手术相关指标及并发症发生情况。结果两组的息肉切除总有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组息肉切除时间、住院时间短于对照组,VAS评分及并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论EMR、CSP治疗结肠息肉的效果相当,但CSP所需时间更短,术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快,应用价值更高,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare the effects of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and cold snare polypectomy(CSP)in the treatment of patients with colon polyps.Methods 78 cases of patients with colon polyps admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were randomly divided into two groups,with 39 cases in each group.The control group was treated with EMR,and the observation group was treated with CSP.The polypectomy effect,surgical related indicators and complications were compared between the two groups.Results No statistical difference was found in the total effective rate of polypectomy between the two groups(P>0.05).The polypectomy time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the VAS score and incidence of complications were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions EMR and CSP has similar results effect in the treatment of colon polyps,but CSP requires shorter time,less postoperative pain,fewer complications,faster recovery,and higher application value,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.