期刊文献+

改良根治术与保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌患者的临床效果对比

Comparison on Clinical Effects of Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Surgery in the Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比改良根治术与保乳手术治疗早期乳腺癌患者的临床效果。方法将110例早期乳腺癌患者随机分为对照组(n=55)和观察组(n=55)。对照组采用改良根治术治疗,观察组采用保乳手术治疗,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、并发症发生情况及远期预后情况。结果观察组手术时间和住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率为7.27%,明显低于对照组的23.64%(P<0.05)。术后2年,两组局部复发率(7.27%vs.3.64%)及远处转移率(3.64%vs.1.82%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论早期乳腺癌患者采用改良根治术与保乳手术治疗的远期预后相当,但保乳手术可明显缩短患者手术时间、住院时间,减少患者术中出血量,降低并发症发生率。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of modified radical mastectomy and breast conserving surgery in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer.Methods 110 patients with early breast cancer were divided into control group(n=55)and observation group(n=55).The control group was treated with modified radical mastectomy,and the observation group was treated with breast conserving surgery.The operation related indicators,complications and long-term prognosis of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time and hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group,and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 7.27%,significantly lower than 23.64%in the control group(P<0.05).2 years after surgery,no statistical difference was found in the local recurrence rate(7.27%vs.3.64%)and distant metastasis rate(3.64%vs.1.82%)between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of patients with early breast cancer has similar long-term prognosis with breast conserving surgery,but breast conserving surgery can significantly shorten the operation time and hospitalization time of patients,and reduce the intraoperative blood loss and the incidence of complications.
作者 张晓雷 卢鑫怡 李景刚 王六林 杜伟坡 ZHANG Xiaolei;LU Xinyi;LI Jinggang;WANG Liulin;DU Weipo(Department of Breast Surgery,Yellow River Sanmenxia Hospital,Sanmenxia 472000,China)
出处 《临床医学工程》 2024年第5期585-586,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 早期乳腺癌 改良根治术 保乳手术 治疗效果 Early breast cancer Modified radical mastectomy Breast conserving surgery Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献103

  • 1胡长涛.早期乳腺癌给予保乳术和改良根治术治疗的临床效果及对患者生活质量的影响分析[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志,2020,7(15):32-32. 被引量:1
  • 2麦劲壮,李河,方积乾,刘小清,饶栩栩.Meta分析中失安全系数的估计[J].循证医学,2006,6(5):297-300. 被引量:140
  • 3Mathew J, Asgeirsson KS, Jackson LR, et al. Neoadjuvant endo- crine treatment in primary breast cancer review of literature [J]. Breast ,2010,18 (6) :339 - 344.
  • 4Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients : a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment[ J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 ( 2 ) : 5203 - 5209.
  • 5Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta - analyses: the PRISMA statement [ J]. BMJ ,2009(339) :b2535.
  • 6Leandro G. Meta - analysis in Medical Research [ M ]. Massachu- setts : Blackwell Publishing Ltd ,2005:74 - 78.
  • 7Higgins JPT ,Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.0.2 [ M ]. The Coehrane Collaboration, 2009:201 - 203.
  • 8Turpin DL. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting ran- domized clinical trials aiad systematic reviews [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2005,128 (6) :681 - 685.
  • 9Jadad AR, Mooer RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of re- ports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? [ J ]. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 1 - 12.
  • 10Walsh C ,Walsh S,Tang T,et al. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease : A meta - analysis [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2009,144(1 ):1 -2.

共引文献1007

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部