论知识产权对象与知识产权客体的区分

On the Distinction between the Object and the Subject Matter of IPR

知识产权“对象客体区分论”是知识产权法学研究中最根本、最艰深的问题。该问题充满了“语言的迷雾”,因此需要在辨析法律概念与论理词、澄清语言误用、确定其社会关系基础后,从事实与视角两个方面予以阐述。在区分论的事实指向上,从对象到权利可以分为四个层次:对象(知识)、对象的利用方式(行为)、权利客体(法内好处)与权利内容(具体路径)。在视角上,知识产权“对象客体区分论”可以为知识产权法学研究带来“客体式”的视角,从而形成了一些全新的命题。其中,最核心的命题是:使知识产权成为知识产权的,不是知识产权的对象,而是知识产权的客体。

The distinction between object and subject matter of intellectual property right(IPR)is the most fundamental and difficult issue in the study of IP law.This issue is full of"linguistic fog",therefore,it needs to be clarified from two aspects of facts and perspectives with the premise of analyzing dianoetic words and legal concepts,clarifying misuse of language,and determining the social relationship foundation.In terms of factual aspect of distinction theory,it can be divided into four levels from object to right:the subject matter of IPR,behaviors of using the subject matter,the object of IPR,and the content of IPR.In terms of perspective,the distinction between object and subject matter of IPR can bring a perspective of"object"to IP legal study and form some new propositions.Among them,the most central proposition is:what makes IPR become itself is not the subject matter,but the object of IPR.