摘要
目的探讨互动式健康教育模式在桡骨远端骨折保守治疗患者中的应用效果。方法选取2022年3月-2023年3月笔者所在医院收治的118例桡骨远端骨折行保守治疗的患者为研究对象,采用随机数字法将其分为对照组和观察组,各59例。对照组采用常规健康教育,观察组采用互动式健康教育。比较2组治疗依从性、腕关节功能恢复情况以及生活质量。结果干预后,观察组体位固定、康复锻炼、定期复诊依从人数均多于对照组(χ^(2)=4.933,P=0.026;χ^(2)=6.556,P=0.010;χ^(2)=5.567,P=0.018),观察组掌屈、背伸、桡偏、尺偏角度均优于对照组(t=7.279,P<0.001;t=6.574,P<0.001;t=5.416,P<0.001;t=5.228,P<0.001),生活质量总分高于对照组(t=11.556,P<0.001)。结论互动式健康教育能够提高桡骨远端骨折保守治疗患者的治疗依从性,促进其腕关节功能恢复,从而提升其生活质量。
Objective To explore the effect of applying interactive health education model in patients with conservative treatment of distal radius fracture(DRF).Methods A total of 118 DRF patients treated conservatively in author′s hospital between March 2022 to March 2023 were selected,and randomly divided into an observation group and a control group,each of 59,according to a random number table.The control group received routine health education,while the observation group was provided with interactive health education.Then,the treatment compliance,wrist function recovery and life quality were compared between the two groups.Results After the intervention,the number of body position fixation,rehabilitation exercise and regular check-ups of the observation group was significantly more than that of the control group(χ^(2)=4.933,P=0.026;χ^(2)=6.556,P=0.010;χ^(2)=5.567,P=0.018).Moreover,the angles of palm flexion,dorsalis extension,radial deviation and ulnar deviation in the observation group were significantly better than the latter(t=7.279,P<0.001;t=6.574,P<0.001;t=5.416,P<0.001;t=5.228,P<0.001),and the score of life quality was significantly higher than the latter group(t=11.556,P<0.001).Conclusion Interactive health education can improve the compliance of DRF patients treated conservatively,and promote their recovery of wrist function and life quality.
作者
王静
李银华
WANG Jing;LI Yinhua(Emergency Department,Zhengzhou Orthopaedic Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000,China)
出处
《中国临床护理》
2024年第5期286-289,共4页
Chinese Clinical Nursing
关键词
桡骨远端骨折
保守治疗
互动式健康教育
治疗依从性
生活质量
Distal radius fracture
Conservative treatment
Interactive health education
Treatment inter vention
Quality of life