期刊文献+

妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症患者产前分娩恐惧现状及影响因素

Analysis of prenatal fear and its influencing factors in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症(intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy,ICP)患者产前分娩恐惧现状及其影响因素。方法选取2020年5月-2023年4月广东省惠州市第一妇幼保健院收治的100例ICP患者,采用一般资料调查表、分娩恐惧量表(childbirth attitudes questionnaires,CAQ)、中国分娩自我效能简易问卷(short form of the Chinese childbirth self-efficacy inventory,CBSEI-C32)、康纳-戴维森心理弹性量表(Connor-Davidson resilience scale,CD-RISC)、家庭功能评定量表(family assessment device,FAD)对其进行调查。结果100例ICP患者的CAQ评分为(41.53±4.16)分。多元线性回归分析显示,分娩自我效能、家庭功能是ICP患者产前分娩恐惧的独立影响因素(R 2=0.964,△R 2=0.961,F=354.047,P<0.001)。结论ICP患者产前分娩恐惧处于中度水平,医护人员应对分娩自我效能低下、家庭功能低下的ICP患者给予更多的关注和宣教,帮助其减轻产前分娩恐惧。 Objective To explore the status quo and influencing factors of prenatal fear of delivery in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy(ICP).Methods A total of 100 ICP patients admitted to our hospital between May 2020 and April 2023 were selected and surveyed using a general condition questionnaire,the childbirth attitudes questionnaires(CAQ),short form of the Chinese childbirth self-efficacy inventory(CBSEI-C32),Connor-Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC)and family assessment device(FAD).Results The CAQ score was(41.53±4.16)points.According to the multiple linear regression analysis,the scores of CBSEI-C32 and FAD were independent influencing factors of the CAQ score(R 2=0.964,△R 2=0.961,F=354.047,P<0.001).Conclusion Prenatal fear of ICP patients is at a moderate level,and special attention and health education should be given to those with lower childbirth self-efficacy or family function to relieve their negative feeling.
作者 杨艳婷 YANG Yanting(The First Maternity and Child Health Hospital of Huizhou,Huizhou 516007,China)
出处 《中国临床护理》 2024年第5期317-320,共4页 Chinese Clinical Nursing
关键词 妊娠期肝内胆汁淤积症 分娩恐惧 分娩自我效能 心理弹性 家庭功能 Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy Fear of childbirth Self-efficacy of childbirth Mental resilience Family function
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献82

  • 1方晓义,徐洁,孙莉,张锦涛.家庭功能:理论、影响因素及其与青少年社会适应的关系[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):544-553. 被引量:257
  • 2黄丽,姜乾金,任蔚红.应对方式、社会支持与癌症病人心身症状的相关性研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1996,10(4):160-161. 被引量:434
  • 3Epstein N B,Bishop D S,Levin S.The McMaster model of family functioning[J].Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling,1978,4(4):19-31.
  • 4Epstein N B,Baldwin L M,Bishop D S.The McMaster Family As-sessment Device[J].Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,1983,9:171-180.
  • 5Kabacoff R I,Miller I W,Bishop D S,et al.A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric,medical,and nonclinical samples[J].Journal of Family Psychology,1990,3:431-439.
  • 6Shek D T.The General Functioning Scale of the Family Assessment Device:Does it work with Chinese adolescents[J] ?Journal of Clinical Psychology,2001,57(12):1503-1516.
  • 7Ridenour TyA,Daley J,Reich W.Factor analyses of the Family As-sessment Device[J].Family Process,1999,38:497-510.
  • 8Miller I W,Epstein N B,Bishop D S,et al.The McMaster Family Assessment Device:Reliability and validity[J].Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,1985,11:345-356.
  • 9Miller I W,Ryan C E,Keitner G I,et al.Commentary"Factor Anal-yses of the Family Assessment Device,"by Ridenour,Daley,&Reich[J].Family Process,2000,39(1):141-144.
  • 10Roncone R,Rossi L,Muiere E,et al.The Italian version of the Family Assessment Device[J].Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemi-ol,1998,33:451-461.

共引文献635

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部