公开“推荐-审核”:学术期刊审稿新模式探索

An open“recommendation-review”system:a new way of peer review in academic journals

学术期刊是开展学术研究交流的重要平台,为了保证期刊的学术质量,国内外编辑同人对学术期刊的审稿模式进行了不断改进和优化,但发表时滞长、作者和审稿专家无法就稿件的修改进行有效沟通等问题却一直无法得到有效解决。公开“推荐-审核”审稿作为一种新的审稿模式,在审稿过程中依然执行三审制,只是与传统三审制审稿流程不同。其与传统审稿最大的不同有三:一是将专家审稿的二审环节提前,变为一审,并且由作者自行选择审稿专家;二是将编辑的审核变为二审,除编辑审核外,增加了栏目主持人、评稿团队对专家意见的多重审核;三是增加了对录用稿件、审稿人和审稿意见的公示环节。这一审稿制度最大程度尊重了作者的审稿意愿,营造了和谐融洽的科研成果发表氛围,利于学术交流和创新。学术论文的发表过程由作者、审稿专家、编辑、栏目主持人、评稿团队共同把关,通过制度的完善和程序的公开,保证了审稿结果的公平公正。

Academic journals serves as important platforms for academic research and exchange.In order to ensure the scholorly quality,editors both at home and abroad have constantly been exploring the peer review models.However,problems such as lengthy publication delays and ineffective communication between authors and reviewers regarding manuscript revisions have remained unresolved.As a novel peer review model,the open“recommendation-review”system still implements the tri-review system,but differs from the traditional process in the following three perspectives.First,it moves the second review stage to the first,normally conducted by expert reviewers,and allows the authors to select their reviewers.Second,the previous first stage of review by editors is becomes the second step,additionally incorporating a multi-tiered review on experts'comments from the column hosts and review teams.Third,it introduces a public announcement phase of accepted manuscripts,reviewers and reviewers'comments.This novel review system maximizes respect to the authors in the review process,creates a harmonious and collaborative atmosphere for the publication of scientific achievements,and is conducive to academic communication and innovation.The publishing process of academic papers involves collective scrutiny by authors,reviewing experts,editors,column hosts and review teams.Through the improving and transparency of this review system,the review results are ensured to be fair and just.