摘要
目的汉化绝经期配偶支持问卷,并检验其信效度,为评估我国绝经期女性感知配偶支持提供测量工具。方法应用Brislin翻译模型对英文版绝经期配偶支持问卷进行翻译、回译、文化调适及预试验,形成中文版问卷。采用便利抽样法选择锦州市600名社区绝经期女性进行调查,评价问卷的信效度。结果中文版问卷包括情感支持、工具性支持、评价性支持、性亲密支持4个维度共17个条目。问卷各条目的内容效度指数为0.714~1.000,问卷的平均内容效度指数为0.966。探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为75.834%;验证性因子分析显示,χ^(2)/df为2.095,RMSEA为0.061,CFI为0.958,IFI为0.958,TLI为0.949。问卷的Cronbach′sα系数为0.876,重测信度为0.911,折半信度为0.945。结论中文版绝经期配偶支持问卷具有较好的信效度,可用于测评绝经期女性感知配偶的支持程度。
Objective To translate the Menopausal Spousal Support Questionnaire(MSSQ),and to evaluate its reliability and validity,so as to provide a tool for assessing perceived spousal support in menopausal women in China.Methods A Chinese version of the MSSQ was developed through translation,back-translation,cultural adaption and pre-test following the Brislin translation model,which was then utilized to investigate 600 community menopausal women who were selected using convenience sample from Jinzhou city to test its reliability and validity.Results The Chinese version of the MSSQ included 4 dimensions(emotional support,instrumental support,appraisal support and sexual intimacy support)and 17 items.The content validity index of each item(I-CVI)ranged from 0.714 to 1.000,and the average content validity index of the scale(S-CVI/Ave)was 0.966.Four factors were extracted via exploratory factor analysis,which explained 75.834%of the total variance.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that,χ^(2)/df was 2.095,RMSEA was 0.061,CFI was 0.958,IFI was 0.958,TLI was 0.949.The Cronbach′sαcoefficient of the scale was 0.876,its test-retest reliability was 0.911,and its split-half reliability was 0.945.Conclusion The Chinese version of the MSSQ has good reliability and validity,and it can be used to measure the degree of perceived spousal support in menopausal women.
作者
王存利
王红霞
庞鑫
孔令慧
Wang Cunli;Wang Hongxia;Pang Xin;Kong Linghui(School of Nursing,Jinzhou Medical University,Jinzhou 121000,China)
出处
《护理学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2024年第7期48-52,共5页
Journal of Nursing Science
关键词
绝经期
配偶支持
情感支持
工具性支持
评价性支持
性亲密支持
信度
效度
menopause
spousalsupport
emotional support
instrumental support
appraisal support
sexual intimacy support
reliability
validity