摘要
在关于《资本论》的研究中,列斐伏尔看到了方法论中的历史唯物主义,这就是将历史生成性与结构结合起来的历时性图式中的生成性的结构,这种所谓的历史生成的结构就是生产方式。这正是马克思在《资本论》中所坚持的历史唯物主义科学方法。正因为找到了这一重要的方法论线索,促使了列斐伏尔自己在方法论上的转变。无论他是否自觉意识到这一点,从历史性发生的生产方式去观察一个社会断面,思考一种不合理的社会历史现象,也就会逐渐摆脱抽象的人本主义话语统摄。
In Lefebvre's study on Capital,he saw the historical materialism in methodology,which is the structure of generativity in the diachronic schema that combines historical generativity with structure,and this so-called historically generated structure is the mode of production.This is precisely the scientific method of historical materialism that Marx upholds in Capital.It was the finding of this important methodological clue that necessarily prompted Lefebvre's own methodological shift.Whether he consciously realised it or not,by looking at a social cross-section from the historically occurring mode of production and thinking about an irrational socio-historical phenomenon,he would also gradually escape from the abstract domination of humanistic discourse.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第4期66-79,共14页
Academic Monthly