期刊文献+

基于TARGET数据库的预测神经母细胞瘤患儿预后的列线图构建

Establishment and validation of a survival nomogram for neuroblastoma children based upon TARGET database
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建并验证用于评估神经母细胞瘤患儿无事件生存的临床预测模型。方法收集1986年至2012年来源于TARGET数据库诊断为神经母细胞瘤的817例患儿临床资料,将患儿以2∶1的近似比按随机数字表法分成训练组(544例)和验证组(273例)。LASSO回归分析确定预后相关的影响因素,选取重要的影响因素绘制列线图。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评价列线图对患儿的危险分层能力,利用一致性指数(C指数)、受试者操作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线及其曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)和校准曲线评估列线图的辨别和校准能力,决策曲线评价列线图的临床实用性。结果LASSO回归分析表明年龄、性别、MYCN基因状态、组织学分类、DNA倍体情况和病理类型为神经母细胞瘤患儿无事件生存的独立影响因素。将上述变量纳入预测模型并绘制预测患儿3年、5年、10年的无事件生存率的列线图。预测模型在训练组和验证组中的C指数分别为0.612和0.655,训练组3年、5年、10年ROC曲线的AUC值分别为0.642、0.691、0.715,验证组分别为0.701、0.705、0.776,表明模型具有较好的辨别能力。校准曲线显示,列线图预测的患儿3年、5年、10年无事件生存率与实际结果具有良好的一致性。决策曲线分析表明列线图的预测概率阈值在0.2~0.6时,使用列线图预测神经母细胞瘤患儿的预后更有益。结论基于TARGET数据库中神经母细胞瘤患儿资料构建的列线图预测模型可以对患儿预后风险进行分层,同时计算出患儿的3年、5年和10年无事件生存率,其能辅助临床决策,建议临床推广。 Objective To create and validate a clinical predictive model for event-free survival(EFS)in children of neuroblastoma(NB).Methods From 1986 to 2012,the relevant clinical data for 817 NB children were collected from the database of TARGET.They were randomized by a ratio of approximately 2∶1 into two groups of training(n=544)and validation(n=273).LASSO regression analysis was performed for determining the prognostic factors and important factors were selected for creating a nomogram.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was plotted for evaluating the nomogram's risk stratification capability.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,area under the curve(AUC)and calibration curve were employed for evaluating the nomogram's discrimination and calibration capability.And decision curve was utilized for evaluating the nomogram's clinical utility.Results LASSO regression analysis revealed that age,gender,MYCN status,histological classification,DNA ploidy and pathological type were independent prognostic factors for EFS.These variables were included into the prediction model and a nomogram was created for predicting the EFS at Year 3/5/10.The nomogram had a C-index of 0.612 in training group and 0.655 in validation group.AUC values were 0.642,0.691 and 0.715 at Year 3/5/10 for training group.The validation group had AUC values of 0.701,0.705 and 0.776 at Year 3/5/10,indicating an excellent discriminative capability of the model.The calibration curve demonstrated an excellent agreement between nomogram-predicted 3/5/10-year EFS and actual results.The decision curve analysis indicated that using nomogram for predicting the prognosis of NB children was more beneficial when the prediction probability threshold was(0.2~0.6).Conclusions Constructed with information from NB children in the TARGET database,the nomogram may stratify the prognostic risks of NB children.It can also calculate the 3/5/10-year EFS rates.Its capability of assisting in clinical decision-making is recommended for wider clinical popularization.
作者 陈伟明 白建喜 张炳 方一凡 吴典明 Chen Weiming;Bai Jianxi;Zhang Bing;Fang Yifan;Wu Dianming(Department of General Surgery,Fujian Children's Hospital,Fuzhou 350014,China)
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期296-303,共8页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
关键词 神经母细胞瘤 预测模型 列线图 预后 Neuroblastoma Forecasting model Nomogram Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds. SEER statistics review, 1975-2009 ( Vintage 2009 Populations)[M]. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, 2012.
  • 2Homer M J, Ries LA, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2006[M]. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute, 2009.
  • 3Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, andresponse to treatment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1993, 11 (8): 1466- 1477.
  • 4Shimada H,Ambros IM, Dehner LP, et al. The Ivtemational Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (the Shimada system) [J]. Cancer,1999,86 (2) : 364-372.
  • 5Peuchmaur M Amore ES, Joshi VV, et al. Revision of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification: confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular [J ]. Cancer, 2003, 98 (10) : 2274-2281.
  • 6Monclair T, Brodeur GM, Ambros PF, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) staging system: an INRG Task Force report [J]. J Clin Oncol , 2009, 27 (2): 298-303.
  • 7Brisse HJ,McCarville MB, Granata C, et al. Guidelines for imaging and staging of neuroblastic tumors: consensus report from the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group Project[D]. Radiology, 2011, 261 (1) : 243-257.
  • 8Brodeur GM,Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al. Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1993,11 (8) : 1466- 1477.
  • 9Strother DR,London WB, Schmidt ML, et al. Outcome after surgery alone or with restricted use of chemotherapy for patients with low-risk neuroblastoma: results of Children's Oncology Group study P9641[J]. J Clin Oncol , 2012, 30 (15) : 1842-1848.
  • 10Baker DL, Schmidt ML, Cohn SL, et al. Outcome after reduced chemotherapy for intermediate-risk neuroblastoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2010,363 (14): 1313-1323.

共引文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部