摘要
该文结合某电厂堆载预压地基处理施工监测实例,对获取的大量监测数据进行了分析。通过对数据进行多项式拟合,采用三点法计算最终沉降量以及固结度;同时采用经验双曲线法计算软基处理的最终沉降量与固结度,并对两种方法进行分析。结果表明,经验双曲线法计算的固结度比三点法更小,指出了两种方法在实际工程中应用的注意事项,并做出了合理选择。
This paper analyzes a large amount of monitoring data obtained by combining a construction monitoring example of a certain power plant’s preloading foundation treatment.By fitting polynomial to the data,the final settlement and consolidation degree are calculated by using the three-point method.At the same time,the empirical hyperbolic method is used to calculate the final settlement and consolidation degree of soft foundation treatment,and the two methods are analyzed.The results show that the consolidation degree calculated by the empirical hyperbolic method is smaller than that by the three-point method.Points out the precautions for the application of two methods in practical engineering and makes reasonable choices.
作者
孙广
张彦红
葛青茹
李雅晴
Sun Guang;Zhang Yanhong;Ge Qingru;Li Yaqing(China Hebei Construction&Geotechnical Investigation Group Ltd.)
出处
《勘察科学技术》
2024年第1期16-19,25,共5页
Site Investigation Science and Technology
关键词
堆载预压
最终沉降量
固结度
三点法
经验双曲线法
preloading
final settlement
consolidation degree
three-point method
empirical hyperbolic method