期刊文献+

脑科学素养干预对教与学影响研究

Systematic Review of the Impact of Brain Literacy Interventions On Teaching and Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 脑科学素养指对大脑运作原理的理解和辨识神经迷思(被曲解的脑科学知识)的能力。培养脑科学素养有助于我们理解教与学过程,对促进教育教学有重要意义。本研究遵循PRISMA协议,对脑科学素养干预研究开展系统综述。研究发现,在接受脑科学素养训练后,1)教师教学策略得到优化,教学技能得到提升,师生关系和教学态度均有积极变化;2)学习态度和行为表现有所改善。研究最后探讨了提升脑科学素养的教育模式和策略,以及脑科学素养干预研究存在的问题,如长期追踪研究不足、缺乏定量数据支持及对高等教育教师干预研究缺失等。未来线上干预研究和新兴脑科学技术接受度研究将成为新的研究方向。 Brain literacy refers to the ability to understand the principles of brain operation and identify neural misconceptions.It helps us better understand the process of teaching and learning,and is essential in promoting education and teaching.Following the PRISMA protocol,the paper reports a systematic review of research on brain literacy interventions in education.The study examined multiple factors such as research background,publication area,sample type,scale,research type,and intervention duration,and ultimately selected 32 relevant articles for in-depth analysis.The analysis results revealed optimized teaching strategies,improved teaching skills,and positive changes in the teacher-student relationship and teaching attitudes after receiving the training in brain literacy.In addition,students had improved their learning emotions,attitudes,and behavioral performance after receiving relevant interventions.The study found that improving brain literacy can effectively enhance the quality of teaching and the learning ability of students.The study also explored the educational models and methods for enhancing brain literacy and identified some problems in the current research on brain literacy intervention,such as insufficient long-term tracking research,lack of quantitative data support,and a lack of research on intervention for higher education teachers.Future online intervention research and acceptance of emerging brain technologies will become new research directions.
作者 杨进中 赵良千 王兴华 宋述婷 李林林 YANG Jinzhong;ZHAO Liangqian;WANG Xinghua;SONG Shuting;LI Linlin(Teachers'College,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266071,China)
出处 《开放教育研究》 北大核心 2024年第3期87-97,共11页 Open Education Research
基金 青岛市教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度重大课题“‘互联网+’背景下教育创新模式研究”(QJK135A910) 山东省自科面上项目“基于fNIRS脑成像技术的人-AI多模态交互及儿童认知和情感发展机制研究”(ZR2023MF059)。
关键词 脑科学素养 干预 系统综述 brain literacy intervention systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献83

  • 1The cooperation study group of moral judgement of children.国内81个地区5—11岁儿童道德判断发展调查[J].心理科学通讯,1982,5(1):24-28. 被引量:5
  • 2桑新民.学习究竟是什么?——多学科视野中的学习研究论纲[J].开放教育研究,2005,11(1):8-17. 被引量:98
  • 3Fischer, K. W. , Daniel, D. B. , Immordino- Yang, M. H. , Stem, E. , Battro, A. , & Koizumi, H. ( 2007 ) . Why mind, brain, and education? Why now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 1 -2.
  • 4Chall, J.S. & Mirsky, A. F. (1978). Education and the Brain. Chicago: the University of Chicago, p. 377.
  • 5Battro, A. M. Fischer, K. and Lena, P. (2008). The Educated Brain. New York: Cambridge University Press. P. 169.
  • 6della Chiesa , B. Christoph, V. , and Hinton, C. (2009) How Many Brains Does It Take to Build a New Light: Knowledge Management Challenges of a Tnmsdisciplinary Project. Mind, brain, and Education 3, 18 -26.
  • 7OECD (2007) . Understanding the Brain: The Birth of a New Learning Science. Paris: OECD Publications. p. 133.
  • 8OECD (2002) Understanding the Brain: Towards a New Learning Science. Paris: OECD Publications. p. 84.
  • 9Samuels, B. M. (2009) . Can the Differences Between Education and Neuroscience be Overcome by Mind, Brain, and Education.'? Mind, Brain, and Education 3 ( 1 ), 45 - 55.
  • 10Neville, H. J. & J. T. Bruer (2001) . Language Processing: How experience Affects Brain Organization. In D. B. Bailey, J. T. Bluer, F. J. Symons & J. W. Lichtman ( Eds. ) , Critical thinking about critical periods (pp. 151 - 172) . Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

共引文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部