摘要
足球合同违约不仅导致赔偿,还可能引发体育制裁。将此类由体育制裁引发的争议提交至国际体育仲裁院(Court of Arbitration for Sport,CAS),须将足球主管机构作为被诉方。在审查此类案件中,仲裁庭首先确认合同违约是否发生在保护期内;对违约球员、违约俱乐部和诱导球员违约俱乐部施加的体育制裁不同,仲裁庭的审查要件和裁判标准也存在区别。在处理此类案件的过程中,CAS尊重足球主管机构在体育制裁方面的裁量权,同时确保这一裁量权的行使正当及在合理范围之内。
Breach of football contract not only leads to compensation,but also may trigger sports sanction.To submit disputes arising from sports sanction to the Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS),the football regulatory authority must act as the defendant.In reviewing such cases,the CAS Panel firstly confirms whether the breach of contract occurs during the protection period.The sports sanction imposed on players and clubs are different,thus there are differences in the review requirements and refe-ree standards of CAS.In dealing with such cases,CAS respects the discretion of football regulatory authority in such sports sanctions,while ensuring that the exercise of this discretion is legitimate and within a reasonable range.
作者
向会英
张林
XIANG Huiying;ZHANG Lin(Sports Law Research Institute of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China;School of Economics and Management,Shanghai University of Sport,Shanghai 200438,China)
出处
《体育科研》
2024年第3期31-38,51,共9页
Sport Science Research
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BTY058)。
关键词
足球
合同违约
体育制裁
国际体育仲裁院
裁判法理
football
contract breach
sports sanction
Court of Arbitration for Sport
adjudication jurisprudence