缅甸“政变”的中美地缘政治话语比较研究

A Comparative Study of Chinese and American Geopolitical Discourse on the“Coup”in Myanmar

国际社会中强势的地缘政治话语,往往通过对特定热点区域的干涉,来压制地缘政治博弈对手的地缘政治话语,试图实现在该区域的话语霸权。近年来,缅甸逐步成为美国利用话语霸权形成对中国制衡的典型案例。研究利用Nvivo软件,通过对中国外交部官网和美国国务院官网关于缅甸“政变”的相关话语进行话语分析,主要得出以下结论:“稳定”和“民主”分别是中国外交部和美国国务院对缅地缘政治话语的核心;中国地缘政治话语强调地缘空间内国家之间的平等,美国地缘政治话语则重视主客体关系;美国对缅内政的干涉以及对中国的施压都是其“民主话语霸权”地缘政治话语的表征和路径,而中国坚持以“合作共赢”地缘政治话语来应对缅甸“政变”和国际社会的压力。中国“合作共赢”地缘政治话语是对美国“民主话语霸权”地缘政治话语的一种价值超越,促进了中国与世界的积极互动。

The study utilized Nvivo software to conduct discourse analysis on the official websites of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the US State Department regarding the“coup”in Myanmar.The main conclusions were drawn as follows:“stability”and“democracy”are the core of the geopolitical discourse of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the US State Department towards Myanmar respectively;Chinese geopolitical discourse emphasizes equality between countries in the geopolitical space,while American emphasizes the relationship between subject and object;The interference of the United States in Myanmar’s internal affairs and its pressure on China are both manifestations and paths of its“democratic discourse hegemony”geopolitical discourse,while China insists on using a“win-win cooperation”geopolitical discourse to respond to Myanmar’s“coup”and international pressure.China’s discourse is a value transcendence of the United States’“democratic discourse hegemony”geopolitical discourse,promoting positive interaction between China and the world.