期刊文献+

不同边界层参数化方案在中国西南地区东部高分辨率气候模拟中的敏感性研究

Sensitivity Analysis of Different Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes in High-Resolution Climate Simulation over East of Southwestern China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了进一步评估和提高区域模式对西南地区东部高分辨率气候的模拟能力,利用WRF模式,采用多种边界层参数化方案(下称“不同方案”)对西南地区东部1998—2019年夏季降水和气温进行双重嵌套模拟(外层为D01,内层为D02)。对比不同方案模拟结果表明:多年平均降水量在D01中基本为湿偏差;D02中在四川盆地和重庆低海拔地区为干偏差,湿偏差主要位于贵州和重庆的城口、石柱和武隆一带的地形复杂区;总体上D01中ACM2方案误差最小,D02中MYJ方案误差最小。对多年平均气温的模拟在D01中除了四川盆地一带为暖偏差外其余大部地区基本为冷偏差,D02中大部地区为暖偏差;总体上D01和D02中MYJ方案误差最小,YSU方案最大。对于降水量和平均气温年际变化的模拟技巧在D01和D02中相对较高的地区均集中在重庆中西部和湖北大部地区;降水量总体为YSU方案最高,MYJ方案最低;平均气温总体为MYJ方案最高,ACM2方案最低。因此,提升模式分辨率至对流尺度后对不同气象要素模拟技巧最优的方案存在差异,需根据业务情况选择适合本地的参数化方案。 To further assess and enhance the capabilities of regional models for high-resolution climate simulation in the east of Southwestern China(ESWC),the present study investigated two nested simulations(with D01 as the outer domain and D02 as the inner domain)of summer rainfall and temperature over the ESWC from 1998 to 2019.These simulations were conducted using the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF)model coupled with various boundary layer parameterization schemes.The findings indicated that different parameterization schemes can lead to biases in the simulated mean annual rainfall.Specifically,the D01 domain exhibited a noticeable wet bias,while the D02 domain showed a dry bias in the Sichuan Basin and the lower altitudes of Chongqing.A wet bias was predominantly found in the complex terrain areas of Chengkou,Shizhu and Wulong in Chongqing,as well as in Guizhou.Overall,the YSU scheme in D01 and the MYJ scheme in D02 demonstrated the smallest bias in rainfall simulations.Regarding temperature simulations,a noticeable warm bias was present in D01for the Sichuan Basin,with a cold bias in other areas.In D02,a warm bias was observed for most regions.The MYJ scheme exhibited the least bias,while the YSU scheme showed the greatest bias in both domains.The WRF model skillfully reproduced the interannual variability of rainfall and temperature in the midwest of Chongqing and most of Hubei.The YSU scheme outperformed others in rainfall simulation,while the MYJ scheme excelled in temperature simulation.These results suggest that the choice of an optimal scheme may vary depending on the meteorological parameter of interest,especially after model resolution is enhanced to the convective scale.Therefore,it is crucial to select the most suitable local scheme based on operational requirements.
作者 吴遥 唐红玉 蒋兴文 董新宁 WU Yao;TANG Hongyu;JIANG Xingwen;DONG Xinning(Chongqing Climate Center,Chongqing 401147,China;Institute of Plateau Meteorology,China Meteorological Administration/Heavy Rain and Drought-Flood Disaster in Plateau and Basin Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610072,China)
出处 《热带气象学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期248-257,共10页 Journal of Tropical Meteorology
基金 重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0558) 中国气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2022J031) 重庆市气象局智慧气象技术创新团队项目(YWJSGG-202208)共同资助。
关键词 西南地区东部 WRF模式 边界层方案 East of Southwest China WRF model boundary layer parameterization scheme
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部