我国公共体育服务场地设施相关政策的问题审视和应对举措--基于124份政策文本的定量分析

Examination of Problems and Response Initiatives of Policies Related to Venue Facilities for Public Sports Services in China--Quantitative Analysis Based on 124 Policy Texts

大力推进公共体育服务建设既是满足人民群众日益增长的体育需求的有效途径,也是提升我国体育综合实力和实现体育强国重要目标的基础性工作。运用文本分析等研究方法,以124份公共体育服务场地设施相关政策文本为样本,对我国公共体育服务场地设施相关政策的主要问题、现实成因及应对举措进行分析和探讨。研究发现,我国公共体育服务场地设施相关政策呈现出政策颁布的不平衡性、政策目标和发展实际的不匹配性、政策实施缺乏强有力的法律支撑、政策主体的权责利不清晰、政策内嵌缺乏科学性等主要问题。究其原因,主要是政策研制层面的主体权威性有待提升,政策颁布层面的相关利益主体存在冲突,政策执行层面的民众参与能动性不强。由此提出增强政策的稳定性和可操作性、加强政策的执行力和监督力、推动政策实施的法制化和程序化、提升政策决策的科学化和民主化、推进政策监管的专业化和智慧化的应对举措。

Vigorously promoting the construction of public sports services is not only an effective way to meet the growing sports demand of the people,but also a fundamental work to enhance the comprehensive strength of sports in China and realize the important goal of a strong sports nation.With the research method of text analysis,124 policies related to public sports service venues and facilities are taken as samples to analyze and discuss the main problems,realistic causes and response initiatives of policies related to public sports service venues and facilities in China.The study finds that the policies related to public sports service venues and facilities in China present the main problems of unbalanced policy promulgation,mismatch between policy objectives and development reality,lack of strong legal support for policy implementation,unclear rights and responsibilities of policy subjects,and lack of scientific embeddedness in the policies.The main reasons for this are that the authority of the subject at the policy development level needs to be improved,the relevant stakeholders at the policy promulgation level are in conflict,and the people's participation at the policy implementation level is not active.It is proposed to enhance the stability and operability of policies,strengthen the execution and supervision of policies,promote the legalization and proceduralization of policy implementation,enhance the scientificization and democratization of policy decision-making,and promote the professionalization and wisdom of policy supervision.