醉驾不起诉的教义学展开

A Legal Doctrinal Analysis of Non-prosecution of Drunk Driving Crime

我国已经步入了轻罪时代。在犯罪圈逐渐扩张的时代背景下,有必要研究醉驾型危险驾驶罪的不起诉问题。不起诉制度的活力应当进一步释放,从而将一部分醉驾案件在审前阶段得以分流,这不仅能节约司法资源,更能发挥出不起诉制度应有的犯罪治理功能。需要通过法教义学的方法对醉驾案件适用法定不起诉、酌定不起诉、存疑不起诉和特别不起诉等制度的条件进行拆解式分析,并参考典型案例对司法实践中醉驾案件不起诉的运用情况进行实证研究。通过总结与对比,分析出四种不起诉制度在醉驾治理中的优势与不足,提出相应的具有针对性的完善建议。具体而言,法定不起诉的标准应当统一和明确,酌定不起诉的自由裁量尺度应得到合理控制,存疑不起诉的完善需要司法机关和刑辩律师的共同努力。

China has stepped into the era of misdemeanor, and it is necessary to increase the application rate of non-prosecution of drunk driving crime in the context of the gradual expansion of the criminal circle. The vitality of the non-prosecution system under China's criminal procedure law should be further released, so that a part of drunk driving cases can be diverted at the pre-trial stage, which not only saves the judicial resources, but also gives full play to the proper function of the non-prosecution system. It is necessary to use the method of legal doctrine to analyze the conditions of applying statutory non-prosecution, discretionary non-prosecution, doubtful non-prosecution and special non-prosecution in drunk driving cases, and to carry out empirical research with the help of typical cases of non-prosecution in drunk driving cases in judicial practice. The study analyzes the advantages and shortcomings of the four non-prosecution systems in the management of drunk driving, and puts forward corresponding targeted recommendations for improvement. Specifically, the standard of statutory non-prosecution should be unified and clear, the discretion of discretionary non-prosecution should be reasonably controlled, and the improvement of doubtful non-prosecution requires the joint efforts of judicial organs and criminal defense lawyers.