4Norman,L.Webb. Alignment of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States [ R]. Washington, DC :Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.23.
5S. Sireei,F. Robin,K. Meara,H. Rogers,H. Swaninathan. An External Evaluation of the 1996 Grade 8 NAEP Science Framework [A]. N. Raju,J. Pelligrino,M. Bertenthal,K. Mitchell,L. Jones (Eds.). Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP [C]. Washington, DC : National Academies Press,2000.74-100.
6R. Rothman,J. Slattery,J. Vranek, L. Resnick. Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing[ J ]. Educational Assessment, 2004,9 (1-2) : 1-27.
7N. Webb. Criteria for Alignment of Expectations and Assessments in Mathematics and Science Education (Research Monograph No. 6) [ M ]. Washington, DC : Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.
8N. Webb. Alignment of Science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in Four States (Research Monograph No. 18) [M]. Washington,DC: Council of Chief State School Officers, 1999.
9A. Martone,S. Sireci. Evaluating Alignment between Curriculum,As- sessment,and Instruction[J]. Review of Educational Research,2009,79(4) : 1332-1361.
10Achieve Inc. An Alignment Analysis of Washington State's College Readiness Mathemat- ics Standards with Various Local Placement Tests. Washington,DC : Achieve Inc,2006.
