期刊文献+

基于神经电生理探讨重复外周磁刺激治疗腰椎间盘突出症

Effective of repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation treatment over patients with lumbar disc herniation was observed based on neuroelectrophysiological examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究重复外周磁刺激(rPMS)在腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者中的疗效。方法2023年3-9月期间在康复科住院部或门诊招募LDH患者60例。所有患者随机分配到rPMS组或常规组,每组各30例。两组患者均接受常规物理治疗和药物治疗,rPMS组在此基础上增加rPMS治疗。干预前、干预2周后进行VAS、JOA、神经电生理检查。结果治疗前后比较两组患者的VAS和JOA评分明显降低(P<0.05)。与常规组相比,rPMS组的VAS和JOA评分明显降低(P<0.05)。治疗前后比较,rPMS组的神经电生理检查有显著改善(P<0.05)。治疗2周后,常规组的胫神经运动传导速度、H反射潜伏期和IP峰值较治疗前相比有明显增快(P<0.05),腓神经运动,感觉传导速度和腓肠神经感觉传导速度与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗2周后,rPMS组与常规组相比胫神经运动传导速度、腓神经运动传导速度、腓浅神经感觉传导速度、腓肠神经感觉传导速度、H反射潜伏期和IP峰值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论rPMS可以明显改善和恢复LDH患者的疼痛以及神经损伤。rPMS可以作为一种有效的辅助治疗手段。 Objective To explore the efficacy of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation(rPMS)in patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH).Methods From March 2023 to March 2024,60 LDH patients were recruited in the inpatient or outpatient department of the rehabilitation department of a tertiary hospital.All patients were randomly assigned to the rPMS group or the conventional group,30 cases in each group.Both groups received routine physical therapy,and the rPMS group was treated with rPMS on this basis.VAS,JOA,and neurophysiological tests were performed before intervention and 2 weeks after intervention.Results The VAS and JOA scores of the two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05).Compared with the conventional group,the VAS and JOA scores of the rPMS group were significantly lower(P<0.05).Compared before and after treatment,the neuroelectrophysiological examination of the rPMS group was significantly improved(P<0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,the tibial nerve motor conduction velocity,H reflex latency and IP peak in the conventional group were significantly faster than those before treatment(P<0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,compared with the conventional group,there were significant differences in tibial nerve motor conduction velocity,peroneal nerve motor conduction velocity,superficial peroneal nerve sensory conduction velocity,sural nerve sensory conduction velocity,H reflex latency and IP peak(P<0.05).Conclusion rPMS can significantly improve and restore pain and nerve injury in patients with LDH.rPMS can be used as an effective adjuvant therapy.
作者 袁佳 冯文锋 豆运香 陈璇君 张志鸿 YUAN Jia;FENG Wenfeng;DOU Yunxiang;CHEN Xuanjun;ZHANG Zhihong(Guangdong Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Foshan 528200,China;不详)
出处 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第12期1665-1670,共6页 The Journal of Practical Medicine
基金 广东省中医药重点学科(临床类)建设项目(编号:[粤129]21号) 佛山市“十四五”医学高水平重点专科建设项目(编号:FSGSP145086佛卫函【2021】211号) 佛山市自筹经费类科技创新项目(医学类科技攻关)(编号:2220001004992)。
关键词 重复外周磁刺激 腰椎间盘突出 神经性疼痛 repeat peripheral magnetic stimulation lumbar disc herniation neuropathic pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献84

  • 1龚正丰,姜宏,陈一群,贺九龙,王介麟.腰椎间盘突出症患者步态观察与分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,1994,15(2):70-72. 被引量:6
  • 2高明暄,刘兴炎.中文版Roland-Morris腰痛失能问卷可靠性评定[J].实用医学杂志,2005,21(24):2755-2756. 被引量:34
  • 3励建安,孟殿怀.步态分析的临床应用[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006,28(7):500-503. 被引量:174
  • 4唐勇,刘良荣,侯廷全,刘贤文,贺开贵,官彬,文鹏程,彭吉明,廖先国,黄勇.经皮腰椎间盘旋切术疗效不佳原因分析[J].重庆医学,2007,36(6):539-540. 被引量:1
  • 5Gupta P,Sachdev HP.Safety of oral use of nimesulide in children:systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J].Indian Pediatr.2003;40(6):518-531.
  • 6Kapoor SK,Sharma J,Bstra B,et al.Comparison of antipyretic effect of nimesulide and paracetamol in children attending a secondary level hospital[J].Indian Pediatr 2002;39:473-477.
  • 7Harish J,Chowdhary,SK,Narasimhan KL,et al.Efficacy of nimesulide in pain relief alter day care surgery[J].Indian Pediatr 2002;39:178-182.
  • 8Sethi GR,Sharma S,Batra V,et al.Double-blind,placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide administered orally in acute bronchial asthma[J].Am J Ther 2002;9:281-287.
  • 9Merlani G,Fox M,Oehen HP,et al.Fatal hepato-toxicity secondary to nimesulide[J].Eer J Clin Pharmacol 2001;57:321-326.
  • 10Rainsford KD; Members of the Consensus Report Group on Nimesulide.Nimesulide-a multifactorial approach to inflammation and pain:scientific and clinical consensus[J].Curr Med Res Opin.2006;22(6):1161-1170.

共引文献1436

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部