马札亚尔与民国马克思主义史学界

Magyar Lajos and Marxist Historiography in Republican China

亚细亚生产方式理论是马克思主义学术史上最具争议的论题之一,作为旗帜人物的马札亚尔也同样如此。尽管马札亚尔学说在民国学界的传播引起多元化反响,但随着学术语境的变迁,中国学界对其的认知渐趋同质化和脸谱化。马札亚尔学说的主要缺陷在于理论建构与内容分析的错位及其与中国历史实际的脱节。不过,中国马克思主义史学界在对马札亚尔学说进行理论扬弃的基础上,实现对于中国道路特殊性与世界发展历程的一般性之间关系的反思与再平衡,从而推动中国马克思主义史学的调整与深化。

The theory of the Asiatic mode of production is one of the most controversial topics in the history of Marxist scholarship,and so was Magyar,who was a leading figure in this debate.Despite diverse responses to Magyar's theory within the academic community of the Republican period,Chinese scholars had gradually formed a more homogeneous and stereotypical view on the issue.The main flaw in Magyar's thesis lies in its dislocation between theoretical construction and content analysis and its detachment from the realities of Chinese history.However,through criticizing his theory,Marxist scholars in China had reflected upon the relationship between the particularity of the Chinese path and the generality of world history and adjusted the balance between the two.This process had,in turn,promoted the adjustment and deepening the development of Marxist historiography in China.