期刊文献+

模拟手术法研究髓腔内螺钉加压固定Jones骨折时的理想螺钉长度及其影响因素

Morphological characteristics of the medullary canal of the fifth metatarsal and their influence on the fixation of Jones fractures with intramedullary screws
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过虚拟手术法研究髓腔内螺钉加压固定Jones骨折时螺钉的理想长度及影响因素。方法回顾性分析2020年1月至2020年5月江苏省人民医院创伤骨科采集的44例患者(44侧足)的影像学资料。男26例,女18例;年龄(29.5±5.6)岁。正位X线片上测量第5跖骨髓腔峡部直径、第5跖骨长度,斜位X线片上测量第5跖骨弧度高度。采用Mimics软件在第5跖骨3D模型上确定跖骨粗隆尖和髓腔中心线,以两者为基础按特定规则生成一组虚拟4.5 mm螺钉模拟固定Jones骨折,其中固定效果最佳的为理想髓腔内螺钉(oIS)。将患者按照oIS长度分为长螺钉组(oIS长度≥40 mm,26例)和短螺钉组(oIS长度<40 mm,18例),比较两组患者间年龄、影像学参数的差异。Pearson相关性分析确定年龄、影像学参数与oIS长度间的关系。结果44侧足的oIS长度为(42.2±7.1)mm,占第5跖骨长度的56.1%±8.3%。短螺钉组第5跖骨髓腔峡部直径(4.4±0.9)mm显著小于长螺钉组(4.9±0.7)mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.040)。两组患者的年龄、第5跖骨长度、第5跖骨弧度高度比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。第5跖骨髓腔峡部直径(r=0.651,P<0.001)、第5跖骨长度(r=0.507,P<0.001)与oIS长度呈正相关,而年龄、第5跖骨弧度高度与oIS长度无显著相关。结论使用4.5 mm髓腔内螺钉加压固定Jones骨折时可以安全地置入长度≥40 mm的oIS,且oIS长度主要受正位X线片上髓腔峡部直径和第5跖骨长度的影响。 ObjectiveTo investigate the optimal length of an intramedullary screw(IS)and its influencing factors in the fixation of Jones fractures through simulated operations.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to analyze the imaging data of 44 cases(44 lateral feet)which had been collected at Department of Orthopaedic Trauma,The People’s Hospital of Jiangsu Province from January 2020 to May 2020.There were 26 males and 18 females,with an age of(29.5±5.6)years.The diameter of the medullary isthmus and the length of the fifth metatarsal bone were measured on the anteroposterior view of the foot;the height of the fifth metatarsal arc was measured on the oblique view.Software Mimics was used to reconstruct 3D models of the fifth metatarsal bone and the centerline of the medullary cavity.A set of virtual 4.5 mm IS were generated using the lines connecting the metatarsal tuberosity and specific points on the centerline as the axis to simulate screw compression fixation for Jones fracture.The screw with the largest length and no contact with the metatarsal cortex was taken as an optimal IS(oIS)which could provide the maximum pressure at the broken ends.The patients were divided into a long screw group of 26 cases(oIS length≥40 mm)and a short screw group of 18 cases(oIS length<40 mm)according to their oIS length.The differences in age and image parameters were compared between the 2 groups.Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to identify the relationships between age,imaging parameters,and oIS length.ResultsThe oIS length of the 44 lateral feet was(42.2±7.1)mm,accounting for 56.1%±8.3%of the length of the fifth metatarsal bone.The diameter of the medullary isthmus in the short screw group[(4.4±0.9)mm]was significantly smaller than that in the long screw group[(4.9±0.7)mm](P=0.040).There was no statistically significant difference in age,the length of the fifth metatarsal bone,or the height of the fifth metatarsal arc between the 2 groups(P>0.05).The diameter of the medullary isthmus(r=0.651,P<0.001)and the length of the fifth metatarsal bone(r=0.507,P<0.001)were positively correlated with the oIS length,while age or the height of the fifth metatarsal arc were not significantly correlated with the oIS length.ConclusionsAn oIS greater than 40 mm in length can be safely placed during compression fixation of a Jones fracture using a 4.5 mm intramedullary screw.The oIS length is mainly affected by the diameter of the medullary isthmus and the length of the fifth metatarsal bone on an anteroposterior image.
作者 张宇 张元桢 秦晓东 李翔 Zhang Yu;Zhang Yuanzhen;Qin Xiaodong;Li Xiang(Department of Orthopaedic Trauma,The First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University&The People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期305-311,共7页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 第5跖骨 骨折 骨折固定术 髓内 模拟手术 加压螺钉 Metatarsal bones Fractures,bone Fracture fixation,intramedullary Simulated surgery Compression screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1郑晓瑛,陈立新.中国人口老龄化特点及政策思考[J].中国全科医学,2006,9(23):1919-1923. 被引量:46
  • 2Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci, 2005, 10: 457-465.
  • 3Hatch RL, Alsobrook JA, Clugston JR. Diagnosis and management of metatarsal fractures. Am Fam Physician, 2007, 76: 817-826.
  • 4Shah SN, Knoblieh GO, Lindsey DP, et al. Intramedullary screw fixation of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int, 2001, 22: 581-584.
  • 5Rammeh S, Heineck J, Zwipp H. Metatarsal fractures. Injury, 2004, 35: 77-86.
  • 6Shereff MJ. Fractures of the forefoot. Instr Course Lect, 1990, 39: 133-140.
  • 7Heineck J, Liebscher T, Zwipp H. Fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures. Orthop Trauma, 2001, 9: 141-147.
  • 8Portland G, Kelikian A, Kodros S. Acute surgical management of Jones' fractures. Foot Ankle Int, 2003, 24: 829-833.
  • 9Desmond EA, Chou LB. Current concepts review: Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Int, 2006, 27: 653-660.
  • 10Lattermann C, Goldstein JL, Wukich DK, et al. Practical management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes. Clin J Sport Med, 2007, 17: 311-315.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部