期刊文献+

论大学学术共同体的时代纠结

On the Dilemma of Today's University Academic Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 内外和谐、形神兼备的学术共同体是现代大学健康发展的重要组织载体。伴随着时代的演进,中国大学学术共同体呈现出与传统迥异的生长样态,既有创新发展,亦少不了困顿纠结。秉持可持续发展的教育理性,现代大学学术共同体理当成为求同存异、形散神聚、灵活自主的教育学术组织。然而在一定程度上,大学本性稀释,主体意识薄弱,形神两分;学术生态异化,轻重失衡,本末倒置;精神领地收缩,取向偏颇,重利轻义。未来,倘若以高质量发展作为参照系来构建中国式现代大学学术共同体,则必须重拾个体学术信仰,并相应筑牢整体的学术信仰支持系统,同时创设开放多元的学术交流平台。 The academic community,with internal and external harmony,both physically and spiritually,is an important organ-izational carrier for the healthy development of modern universities.With the evolution of the times,the academic community of Chinese universities has shown a different growth pattern from the traditional one,with both innovative development and difficul-ty.Adhering to the educational rationality of sustainable development,the modern university academic community should become an educational and academic organization that seeks common ground while reserving differences,forms disperse but the spirit gathers,and is flexible and independent.However,to a certain extent,the nature of the university is diluted,the subject con-sciousness is weak,and the form and spirit are divided with academic ecology dissimilation,power imbalance,mistaken priority,spiritual territory contraction,orientation bias,and profit-oriented pursuit.In the future,if high-quality development is taken as the frame of reference to build the academic community of Chinese-style modern university,it is necessary to regain individ-ual academic belief,build the overall academic belief support system accordingly,and create an open and diversified academic exchange platform.
作者 董云川 冯媛媛 Dong Yunchuan;Feng Yuanyuan(Institute of Higher Education,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091,Yunnan,China;School of Government,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091,Yunnan,China)
出处 《学术探索》 2024年第5期132-142,共11页 Academic Exploration
基金 云南大学人文社科基金项目(K809020321004)。
关键词 学术共同体 中国式现代化 高等教育 学术生态 高质量发展 academic community Chinese modernization higher education academic ecology high-quality development
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献45

  • 1熊良斌,周志娟.归因方式理论概述[J].安徽文学(下半月),2009(6):388-388. 被引量:8
  • 2谢维和,陈超.中国教育改革发展的政策走向分析——20世纪80年代中期以来中国教育政策数量变化研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(3):1-8. 被引量:42
  • 3[英]卡尔·皮尔逊.科学的规范[M].李醒民译.北京:华夏出版社,2003:14-18.
  • 4H. Zuckerman. (1970). Stratification in American Science. Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 40.
  • 5Stephane Baldi. (1998). Normative Versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citation:A Network-Analysis Model. American Sociological Review. Vol. 63, Dec.
  • 6Lowell L. Hargens, Warren O. (1967). Hagstrom, Sponsored and Contest Mobility of American Scientists. Sociology of Education. Vol. 40.
  • 7Val Burris. (2004). The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review. Vol. 69, Apr.
  • 8Alain Touraine. (1974). The Academic System in American Society. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. p133.
  • 9National Science Foundation. (2004). Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation's Merit Review Process( Fiscal Year 2003).
  • 10Stephen Cole, Leonard Rubin and Jonathan R. Cole. (1977). Peer Review and the Support of Science. Scientific American. Vol. 237, Oct.

共引文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部