论解决政府采购评委成员意见分歧的思考

Reflections on Resolving Differences of Opinion within a Bid Evaluation Committee for Government Procurement

政府采购过程是一个很长的链条,政府采购的最终结果,往往取决于评审结果,而评审结果又依赖于评标委员会成员意见。在实际评审中,评委成员难免出现意见不一情形,现行处理分歧的法规没有明确或相互冲突,为推进评审进程,实践中有些公共资源交易中心简单地采取多数决规则解决评委成员间关于共同认定事项的意见分歧,但是多数决规则有着诸多局限,并非所有意见分歧都能通过多数决方式解决,有必要重新界定多数决规则在评审中适用边界和适用规则。

The process of government procurement involves a long chain of events,where decisions regarding the items to be procured often rely on evaluation results obtained in accordance with the opinions of bid evaluation committee members.In an actual evaluation,it is inevitable that committee members hold divergent views.However,the current regulations in place for resolving these differences are either ambiguous or contradictory.To streamline the evaluation process,some public resource trading centers have adopted the majority rule as a means to resolve differences of opinion among committee members regarding matters that necessitate a joint decision.Nevertheless,the majority rule has several limitations,and not all differences of opinion can be settled through majority voting.Hence,it is crucial to redefine the boundaries and rules for the application of the majority rule in such evaluations.