期刊文献+

理论逻辑、现实逻辑、实践逻辑:以人类命运共同体理念凝聚全球价值共识

Theoretical Logic,Realistic Logic and Practical Logic:Convergence of Global Value Consensus Through the Concept of a Community of Shared Future for Mankind
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以全球性中国方案人类命运共同体理念凝聚全球价值共识,具有深刻的理论逻辑、现实逻辑和实践逻辑。从理论逻辑看,中华优秀传统文化和马克思“真正共同体”思想为人类命运共同体凝聚全球价值共识提供理论基础。从现实逻辑看,以人类命运共同体理念凝聚全球价值共识面临大国博弈样态深陷重围,制约国际秩序的和平与安全;逆全球化思潮强势冲击,影响世界经济的共同繁荣;东西方文明冲突难以耦合,阻滞多元文明的开放包容;各国生态共识分歧,滋生全球生态治理失衡等困境。从实践逻辑看,需要以对话协商、共建共享突破大国博弈之藩篱,构建持久和平和普遍安全的世界;以合作共赢突破逆全球化之思潮,构建共同繁荣的世界;以交流互鉴突破文明冲突之逻辑,构建开放包容的世界;以绿色低碳原则弥合各国分歧,构建清洁美丽的世界。 The concept of a Community of Shared Future for Mankind,as a global Chinese proposition,embodies profound theoretical logic,realistic logic and practical logic in converging global value consensus.From a theoretical perspective,the excellent traditional Chinese culture and Marx’s idea of a“true community”provide a theoretical foundation for the formation of global value consensus under the framework of a community of shared future for mankind.From a realistic viewpoint,the endeavor to converge global value consensus under the concept of a community of shared future for mankind faces challenges such as being entangled in the power rivalry among major countries,which constrains the establishment of an international order of peace and security;being confronted with the strong impact of anti-globalization sentiments,affecting the shared prosperity of the world economy;encountering difficulties in bridging the gaps and clashes between eastern and western civilizations,which hinder the open and inclusive development of diverse civilizations;and dealing with divergences in ecological consensus among nations,leading to imbalances in global ecological governance.In terms of practical logic,it is imperative to break through the barriers of power rivalry through dialogue,negotiation,and collaborative efforts to construct a world of enduring peace and universal security;to overcome anti-globalization sentiments through cooperation and mutual benefit to build a world of shared prosperity;to transcend the logic of civilization clash through exchange,mutual learning,and inclusive approaches to foster an open and inclusive world;and to reconcile differences among nations based on green and low-carbon principles to create a clean and beautiful world.
作者 孔庆茵 孙江 KONG Qingyin;SUN Jiang(College of Marxism,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331)
出处 《攀枝花学院学报》 2024年第3期34-42,共9页 Journal of Panzhihua University
基金 2020年度国家社科基金西部项目“人类命运共同体世界秩序模式研究”(20XGJ001)。
关键词 人类命运共同体 全人类价值共识 理论逻辑 现实逻辑 实践逻辑 community of shared future for mankind global value consensus theoretical logic realistic logic practical logic
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献30

  • 1张玉堂.个人利益和共同利益的矛盾及其协调[J].武汉大学学报(人文科学版),1999,53(1):16-19. 被引量:3
  • 2董漫远.全人类共同利益与中国的和平发展[J].国际问题研究,2005(5):15-21. 被引量:14
  • 3[美]亚历山大·温特 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年版.第440-445页.
  • 4[美]摩根索.《国家间政治》.徐昕等译.中国人民公安大学出版社.1990年版,第203页.
  • 5Charles Tilly, The formation of national states in Western Europe, Prinston, Pfinston University Press, 1975, p. 15.
  • 6Knud Erik Jorgensen, Beyond European Leviathans: Differentiating Layers of International Transformation, in European Identities : Cultural Diversity and Integration in Europe Since 1700, Edited by Nils Arne Sorensen, Odense University Press, 1995, p. 210.
  • 7Habermas, Citizenship and National Identity:Some Reflections on the Future of Europe, in L' Europe au soir du siecle, edited by J. Lenoble and N. Dewandre, Paris, Edition Esprit, 1992.
  • 8Arrighi, "World Income Inequalities and the Future of Socialism", New Left Review, 1991, 189: 64- 65.
  • 9Barry Buzan, The System Context of European Community, Working paper 1989/5, Copenhagen, Centre for Peace Conflict Research, p. 30.
  • 10Kratochwill,“The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism and the Science of Realpolitik without Politics”, Review of International Studies, 1993, pp. 74 - 79.

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部